Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • am part of a team exploring how Web 2.0 should be incorporated into our
    1 KB (185 words) - 04:14, 22 November 2023
  • .... His major areas of research are: geoscience education, online learning, web 2.0 applications, global climate change, the scholarship of teaching and learni
    1 KB (185 words) - 04:35, 22 November 2023
  • ...I also [http://edit.emich.edu/index.php?title=SOTL:Main have researched] Web 2.0 communities and community building, and social knowledge projects. I have
    2 KB (363 words) - 21:51, 3 October 2009
  • ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on whichever encyclop
    1 KB (249 words) - 21:12, 26 December 2007
  • ==Web 2.0== ...ites cannot yet afford the implementation overhead. But tools support for Web 2.0 design approaches continues to evolve rapidly as of 2008, and this has resu
    12 KB (1,802 words) - 08:48, 22 April 2024
  • ...ve blog on everything about collective intelligence, wisdom of the crowds, Web 2.0 Contact: Howard Rheingold.
    2 KB (233 words) - 15:41, 26 January 2023
  • ...s. His current research interests include asynchronous online discussions, Web 2.0, and 1:1 computer initiatives. Major current events include chairing educat
    2 KB (242 words) - 04:07, 22 November 2023
  • ...such as AMP, GE and Westfield. She is deeply involved with open source and web 2.0 online communities. Over the past few years Kate has worked with marketing
    3 KB (379 words) - 04:11, 22 November 2023
  • ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on what they want, wh
    2 KB (356 words) - 13:31, 8 January 2008
  • ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on what they want, wh
    2 KB (387 words) - 13:43, 8 January 2008
  • ...erent projects, and have become very interested in community management in Web 2.0. Since the only thing really differing CZ from WP is its pretensions toward
    2 KB (324 words) - 04:49, 22 November 2023
  • {{rpr|Web 2.0}}
    3 KB (454 words) - 09:14, 28 March 2024
  • ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on what they want, wh
    2 KB (364 words) - 03:15, 11 October 2007
  • {{rpr|Web 2.0}}
    4 KB (660 words) - 10:45, 7 March 2024
  • ...This is a matter of personal preferences of many individuals. Perhaps most web 2.0 participants are attracted by 'as free as possible' kind of license.
    4 KB (698 words) - 09:55, 4 November 2007
  • ...ren't really seeing the potential that you would hope for with all of the Web 2.0 tools out there. We aren't seeing the academic community take advantage of
    7 KB (1,079 words) - 03:41, 22 November 2023
  • {{rpr|Web 2.0}}
    11 KB (1,461 words) - 10:46, 7 March 2024
  • ...riety of web based mashups. [[Tim O'Reilly]] lists Mashups as one of the [[Web 2.0]] technologies. <ref name="Web2.0"> title="Levels of the Game: The Hierarchy of Web 2.0 Applications"}}
    24 KB (3,662 words) - 09:57, 20 August 2023
  • ...ice.eu/resource/1680 2007, State-of-the-art in Good Practice Exchange and Web 2.0 - Report prepared by ePractice.eu - a project funded by the European Commi
    6 KB (945 words) - 20:25, 22 March 2008
  • ...tarted by a co-founder of Wikipedia, Dr. Larry Sanger, is quite unusual as Web 2.0 projects go. "We are focused on quality and responsibility as well as quan
    5 KB (685 words) - 19:30, 22 December 2007
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)