Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...pulation and the study population, which leads to an overestimation of the sensitivity and specificity of a test.
    220 bytes (31 words) - 20:08, 8 September 2009
  • ...fter passive leg raising!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    2 KB (217 words) - 09:05, 6 October 2010
  • 4 KB (525 words) - 07:42, 4 May 2024
  • A structured physical examination of an injured ankle that, with high [[sensitivity and specificity]], will determine if any bones of the ankle or lower leg are broken. By usi
    382 bytes (57 words) - 17:55, 11 June 2010
  • ...=1980 |pmid=6446157 |doi=}}</ref> However, in one study this reduces the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of the test from 67% to 41%.<ref name="pmid17601462">{{cite j ...">{{cite journal |author=Majlesi J, Togay H, Unalan H, Toprak S |title=The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar dis
    6 KB (798 words) - 02:53, 15 June 2010
  • 3 KB (367 words) - 11:15, 10 August 2010
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    344 bytes (43 words) - 17:04, 14 July 2008
  • * Total lymphocyte count of more than 2000 has [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] or 95% * Total lymphocyte count of less than 1200 has [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 95%
    2 KB (309 words) - 22:03, 3 June 2011
  • ...ef name="pmid12559279">{{cite journal| author=Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG| title=Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a c
    2 KB (244 words) - 11:11, 2 September 2011
  • The likelihood ratio is an alternative to [[sensitivity and specificity]] for the numeric interpretation of [[diagnostic test]]s. In a [[randomized Likelihood ratios are related to [[sensitivity and specificity]].
    4 KB (604 words) - 10:10, 19 June 2024
  • ...h have a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] over 90% but have a [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of less than 70%.<ref name="pmid19586584"/><ref name="pmid177
    3 KB (397 words) - 13:33, 15 June 2012
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    485 bytes (59 words) - 05:16, 27 June 2009
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    497 bytes (62 words) - 19:55, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    499 bytes (64 words) - 20:32, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    643 bytes (79 words) - 18:05, 11 January 2010
  • ! &nbsp;!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]!![[Sensitivity
    8 KB (1,026 words) - 12:49, 10 February 2011
  • ...ction with a pooled [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 0.97, [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 0.96."<ref name="pmid17636770">{{cite journal |author=Abba
    3 KB (452 words) - 21:58, 22 February 2009
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]: 60%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>, 64%<ref name="pmid8309266">{{c * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]: 70%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>
    6 KB (890 words) - 16:47, 13 May 2023
  • ! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    3 KB (418 words) - 13:21, 15 February 2009
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity| sensitivity]] = 92% * [[Sensitivity and specificity| specificity]] is uncertain and ranges from 88 to 96%
    8 KB (1,056 words) - 13:29, 10 February 2023
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)