Health care quality assurance: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
(Started "see also")
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
==Measuring quality==
==Measuring quality==
Chart abstraction may underestimate quality.<ref name="titleHow well does chart abstraction measure quality? A...[Am J Med. 2000] - PubMed Result">{{cite web |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10856412?ordinalpos=101 |title=How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A...[Am J Med. 2000] - PubMed Result |accessdate=2008-02-12 |author= |authorlink= |coauthors= |date= |format= |work= |publisher= |pages= |language= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote=}}</ref>
Chart abstraction may underestimate quality.<ref name="titleHow well does chart abstraction measure quality? A...[Am J Med. 2000] - PubMed Result">{{cite web |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10856412?ordinalpos=101 |title=How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A...[Am J Med. 2000] - PubMed Result |accessdate=2008-02-12 |author= |authorlink= |coauthors= |date= |format= |work= |publisher= |pages= |language= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote=}}</ref>
==Improving quality==
More experience, as measured by volume of care, is associated with better quality of care.<ref name="pmid18043982">{{cite journal |author=Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lin HC, Hwang YT |title=Does physicians' case volume impact inpatient care costs for pneumonia cases? |journal=J Gen Intern Med |volume=23 |issue=3 |pages=304-9 |year=2008 |pmid=18043982 |doi=10.1007/s11606-007-0462-3 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0462-3 |issn=}}</ref>


==Public reporting of quality measures==
==Public reporting of quality measures==

Revision as of 00:28, 6 April 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Health care quality assurance is "activities and programs intended to assure or improve the quality of care in either a defined medical setting or a program. The concept includes the assessment or evaluation of the quality of care; identification of problems or shortcomings in the delivery of care; designing activities to overcome these deficiencies; and follow-up monitoring to ensure effectiveness of corrective steps."[1]

Creating quality measures

Creating quality measures from clinical practice guidelines can be problematic.[2]

Measuring quality

Chart abstraction may underestimate quality.[3]

Improving quality

More experience, as measured by volume of care, is associated with better quality of care.[4]

Public reporting of quality measures

A systematic review found that "publicly releasing performance data stimulates quality improvement activity at the hospital level. The effect of public reporting on effectiveness, safety, and patient-centeredness remains uncertain".[5]

References

  1. Anonymous (2024), Health care quality assurance (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  2. Walter LC, Davidowitz NP, Heineken PA, Covinsky KE (2004). "Pitfalls of converting practice guidelines into quality measures: lessons learned from a VA performance measure". JAMA 291 (20): 2466–70. DOI:10.1001/jama.291.20.2466. PMID 15161897. Research Blogging.
  3. How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A...[Am J Med. 2000 - PubMed Result]. Retrieved on 2008-02-12.
  4. Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lin HC, Hwang YT (2008). "Does physicians' case volume impact inpatient care costs for pneumonia cases?". J Gen Intern Med 23 (3): 304-9. DOI:10.1007/s11606-007-0462-3. PMID 18043982. Research Blogging.
  5. Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG (2008). "Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care". Ann. Intern. Med. 148 (2): 111–23. PMID 18195336[e]

See also

External links