Archive:Family-Friendly Policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>ZachPruckowski m (very basic start at policy - blast it away.) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Citizendium''' will have standards for inclusion for its articles. In addition to policies on [[Citizendium_Pilot: | '''Citizendium''' will have standards for inclusion for its articles. In addition to policies on [[Citizendium_Pilot:Feasibility Policy|feasibility]], [[Citizendium_Pilot:Neutrality Policy|neutrality]], and others, Citizendium will have an exclusion policy based on obscenity. Citizendium is meant for readers of all ages, and so as little sexually objectionable material as possible. | ||
==Topics that aren't notable== | ==Topics that aren't notable== | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 12 November 2006
Citizendium will have standards for inclusion for its articles. In addition to policies on feasibility, neutrality, and others, Citizendium will have an exclusion policy based on obscenity. Citizendium is meant for readers of all ages, and so as little sexually objectionable material as possible.
Topics that aren't notable
Some topics should not be counted for an article's notability. If a subject is notable only for one of these reasons, it should not be included. However, if an article is notable for another reason, it should still be included. For instance, Marilyn Monroe is a Playboy model, but she is also notable as an actress, and thus should clearly be included.
The following topics should not be considered for notability:
- Modelling in a pornographic magazine.
- Appearing in a pornographic film.
- A sex act based solely on descriptions available from unreliable sources or pornographic films