Fourier expansion electromagnetic field: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
imported>Milton Beychok
m (Added a wiki link)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
The [[electromagnetic wave|electromagnetic (EM) field]] is of importance as a carrier of solar energy and electronic signals (radio, TV, etc.).  As its name suggests, it consists of two tightly coupled [[vector fields]], the [[electric field]] '''E''' and the [[magnetic field]] '''B'''.  The '''Fourier expansion of the electromagnetic field''' is used in the [[quantization of the electromagnetic field| quantization of the field]]  that leads to [[photon]]s, light particles of well-defined energy and momentum. Further the Fourier transform plays a role in theory of wave propagation  through different media and light scattering.
The [[electromagnetic wave|electromagnetic (EM) field]] is of importance as a carrier of solar energy and of electronic signals (radio, TV, etc.).  As its name suggests, it consists of two [[vector fields]], the [[electric field]] '''E''' and the [[magnetic field]] '''B'''.  The '''Fourier expansion of the electromagnetic field''' is used in the [[quantization of the electromagnetic field| quantization]]  that leads to [[photon]]s (light particles of well-defined energy and momentum). Further the Fourier transforms of  EM fields play a role in theory of wave propagation  through different media and light scattering.


In the absence of charges and electric currents, both '''E''' and '''B''' can be derived from a third real vector field, the [[vector potential]] '''A'''.  In this article the [[Fourier transform]] of the fields '''E''', '''B''', and '''A''' will be discussed. It will be seen that the  expansion of the [[vector potential]] '''A''' yields the expansions of the real  fields '''E''' and '''B'''. Further the energy and momentum of the EM field will be expressed in the Fourier components of '''A'''.   
In the absence of charges and electric currents (that is, in [[Free space (electromagnetism)|"free" space]]), both '''E''' and '''B''' can be derived from a third vector field, the [[vector potential]] '''A'''.  Below, the [[Fourier transform]] of the three real fields '''E''', '''B''', and '''A''' will be introduced. It will be seen that the  expansion of the [[vector potential]] '''A''' yields the expansions of the fields '''E''' and '''B'''. Further the energy and momentum of the EM field will be expressed in the Fourier components of '''A'''.   


==Fourier expansion of a vector field==
==Fourier expansion of a vector field==
For an arbitrary real scalar function of ''x'', with 0≤ ''x''≤ ''L'', the [[Fourier series|Fourier expansion]] is the following
A real scalar function ''f''(''x''), with 0 ≤ ''x'' ≤ ''L'', has the following [[Fourier series|Fourier expansion]]:
:<math>
:<math>
\begin{align}
\begin{align}
Line 13: Line 13:
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math>
</math>
where the bar indicates [[complex conjugation]] and the definition of the Fourier components is obvious.
where the bar indicates [[complex conjugation]] and the definition of the Fourier components is obvious. Note that the summand consists of a term plus its complex conjugate and hence is real.
For an arbitrary real vector field '''F''' its Fourier expansion is easily generalized, it is the following:  
For a real scalar field ''f''('''r''') depending on three variables, '''r''' &equiv; (''x'', ''y'', ''z''), the Fourier expansion is easily generalized; it is the following:
:<math>
f(\mathbf{r}, t) = \sum_\mathbf{k} \left( f_k(t) e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}
+ \bar{f}_k(t) e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right),\qquad
\mathbf{k} = \frac{2\pi}{L} ( n_x, \; n_y,\; n_z), \quad\hbox{with}\quad n_x,\,n_y,\,n_z = 0,\; 1,\;2,\ldots
</math>
Such an expansion, labeled by a discrete (countable) set of vectors '''k''', is always possible when ''f'' satisfies periodic boundary conditions, i.e., ''f''('''r''' + '''p''',t) = ''f''('''r''',t) for some finite vector '''p'''. To impose such boundary conditions, it is common to consider EM waves as if they are in a virtual cubic box of finite volume ''V'' = ''L''<sup>3</sup>. Waves on opposite walls of the box are enforced to have the same value (usually zero). Note that the waves are not restricted to the box: the box is replicated an infinite number of times in ''x'', ''y'', and ''z''  direction.
 
The expansion above is over the first octant of the (''k''<sub>''x''</sub>, ''k''<sub>''y''</sub>, ''k''<sub>''z''</sub>) lattice.  It is often extended to run over all octants, in which case an overcomplete (linearly dependent, not completely orthogonal) basis is used. When furthermore the expansion is applied to the three components of a vector field '''F'''('''r''',''t'') separately, the result can be written concisely as follows:
:<math>
:<math>
\mathbf{F}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \sum_\mathbf{k} \left( \mathbf{f}_k(t) e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}  
\mathbf{F}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \sum_\mathbf{k} \left( \mathbf{f}_k(t) e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}  
+ \bar{\mathbf{f}}_k(t) e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right),\qquad
+ \bar{\mathbf{f}}_k(t) e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right),\qquad
\mathbf{k} = \frac{2\pi}{L} ( n_x, \; n_y,\; n_z) \quad\hbox{with}\quad n_x,\,n_y,\,n_z = 0,\; 1,\;2,\ldots
\mathbf{k} = \frac{2\pi}{L} ( n_x, \; n_y,\; n_z)\quad\hbox{with}\quad n_x,\,n_y,\,n_z = 0,\pm\; 1,\;\pm2,\ldots
</math>
with the following orthogonality relations,<ref>In many textbooks, the second and third non-orthogonality are overlooked, but since they happen to give terms that mutually cancel, the end result is always correct. However, the necessary proofs of these cancellations  complicate the derivations.</ref>
:<math>
\begin{align}
\iiint_V e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}e^{ i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} &= V \delta_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{k}'},\quad
\iiint_V e^{ i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}e^{ i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} &= V \delta_{\mathbf{k},-\mathbf{k}'},\quad
\iiint_V e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}e^{-i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}}\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} &= V \delta_{\mathbf{k},-\mathbf{k}'}.
\end{align}
</math>
</math>
Such an expansion, labeled by a discrete (countable) set of vectors '''k''', is always possible when '''F''' satisfies periodic boundary conditions, i.e., '''F'''('''r''' + '''p''',t) = '''F'''('''r''',t) for some finite vector '''p'''. To impose such boundary conditions, it is common to consider EM waves as if they are in a virtual cubic box of finite volume ''V'' = ''L''<sup>3</sup>. Waves on opposite walls of the box are enforced to have the same value (usually zero). Note that the waves are not restricted to the box: the box is replicated an infinite number of times in ''x'', ''y'', and ''z''  direction.


==Vector potential==
==Vector potential==
Line 48: Line 63:
</math>
</math>
By definition, a choice of gauge does not affect any measurable properties (the best known example of  a choice of gauge is the fixing of the zero of an electric potential, for instance at infinity).
By definition, a choice of gauge does not affect any measurable properties (the best known example of  a choice of gauge is the fixing of the zero of an electric potential, for instance at infinity).
The Coulomb gauge makes '''A''' transverse as well, and clearly '''A''' is in the same plane as '''E'''. (The time differentiation does not affect direction.) So, the vector fields '''A''', '''B''', and '''E''' are all in the same plane.
The Coulomb gauge makes '''A''' transverse as well, and clearly '''A''' is parallel to '''E'''. (The time differentiation does not affect direction.) The vector fields '''A''', '''B''', and '''E''' are in the same plane, as they are orthogonal to the same longitudinal vector. Hence, the three fields  can be written as a linear combination of two orthonormal vectors, '''e'''<sub>''x''</sub> and '''e'''<sub>''y''</sub>. It is often convenient to choose complex unit vectors obtained by a [[unitary transformation]],
 
The three fields  can be written as a linear combination of two orthonormal vectors, '''e'''<sub>''x''</sub> and '''e'''<sub>''y''</sub>. It is more convenient to choose complex unit vectors obtained by a [[unitary transformation]],
:<math>
:<math>
\mathbf{e}^{(1)}  \equiv \frac{-1}{\sqrt{2}}(\mathbf{e}_x + i \mathbf{e}_y)\quad\hbox{and}\quad\mathbf{e}^{(-1)} \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\mathbf{e}_x - i \mathbf{e}_y)
\mathbf{e}^{(1)}  \equiv \frac{-1}{\sqrt{2}}(\mathbf{e}_x + i \mathbf{e}_y)\quad\hbox{and}\quad\mathbf{e}^{(-1)} \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\mathbf{e}_x - i \mathbf{e}_y)
Line 56: Line 69:
which are orthonormal,
which are orthonormal,
:<math>
:<math>
  \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}\cdot\bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu')} = \delta_{\mu,\mu'}\quad\hbox{with}\quad\mu,\mu'= 1,\, -1.
  \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}\cdot\bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu')} = \delta_{\mu,\mu'}\quad\hbox{with}\quad\mu,\mu'= 1,\, -1,
</math>
</math>
and the bar indicating the complex conjugate.
==Expansions==
==Expansions==
The Fourier expansion of the vector potential reads
The Fourier expansion of the vector potential reads
Line 102: Line 117:
H = \iiint_V \mathcal{E}_\mathrm{Field}(\mathbf{r},t) \mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}.
H = \iiint_V \mathcal{E}_\mathrm{Field}(\mathbf{r},t) \mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}.
</math>
</math>
Use
Use in the expansion of '''E'''&sdot;'''E''' = '''E'''<sup>2</sup> the following
:<math>
:<math>
\begin{align}
\begin{align}
\iiint_V  
\frac{1}{V}\iiint_V  
&\left(  
&\left(
\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'})  a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t) \, e^{i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}} -  
\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'})  a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t) \, e^{i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}} -  
\bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'})  \bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}}  
\bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'})  \bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}}  
Line 115: Line 130:
\bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})  \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}  
\bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})  \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}  
\right)\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} \\
\right)\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} \\
&=-2V\,\delta_{\mu',\mu}\,\delta_{\mathbf{k'},\mathbf{k}}\,a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)
&=
-2\delta_{\mathbf{k'},\mathbf{k}}\delta_{\mu',\mu}\,a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)  \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)\;+\; \delta_{\mathbf{k'},-\mathbf{k}} \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})
\left[a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k}(t) a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{-k}(t)
+  \bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k}(t) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{-k}(t)\right]
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math>
</math>
and
The first term (linear in &delta;<sub><b>k'</b>,'''k'''</sub>) will survive and will be added to the same term appearing in the expansion of '''B'''<sup>2</sup>. It may be tempting to consider what the value will be of the following factor,
:<math>
:<math>
\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}),
</math>
(appearing in the second term, linear in &delta;<sub><b>k'</b>,&minus;'''k'''</sub>), but this is not needed, because it cancels against the very same expression arising in the expansion of '''B'''<sup>2</sup>.
In the expansion of '''B'''<sup>2</sup> the following  appears as the factor of &nbsp;
<font style="vertical-align: text-bottom;">
<math>a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k}(t) a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{-k}(t)</math></font>&nbsp; and&nbsp;  <font style="vertical-align: text-bottom;"><math>\bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k}(t) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{-k}(t): </math></font>
:<math>
\begin{align}
\delta_{\mathbf{k},-\mathbf{k}'} &
\left[\mathbf{k'}\times\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'})\right]\cdot
\left[\mathbf{k}\times\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})\right]
=\delta_{\mathbf{k},-\mathbf{k}'}
\left[ -\big(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{k}\big) \big(\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})\big) \right] -
\left[ -\big(\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})\big) \big(\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{k})\big) \right] \\
&= -k^2\;\delta_{\mathbf{k},-\mathbf{k}'}\; \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})
\end{align}
</math>
Recall that:
(i) The expression of the field energy '''E'''<sup>2</sup> contains a  factor ε<sub>0</sub> and '''B'''<sup>2</sup> the factor 1/μ<sub>0</sub>.
(ii)&nbsp; <math>
\frac{k^2}{\mu_0} = \frac{\omega^2}{c^2\mu_0} = \frac{\epsilon_0\mu_0 \omega^2}{\mu_0} =
\frac{k^2}{\mu_0} = \frac{\omega^2}{c^2\mu_0} = \frac{\epsilon_0\mu_0 \omega^2}{\mu_0} =
\epsilon_0 \omega^2.
\epsilon_0 \omega^2.
</math>
</math>
Then the classical Hamiltonian in terms of Fourier coefficients takes the form
 
(iii) The Fourier expansion of '''E''' contains the factor ω.
 
This means that all ingredients have been mentioned to arrive at the classical Hamiltonian in terms of Fourier coefficients,
:<math>
:<math>
H = 2V\epsilon_0 \sum_\mathbf{k}\sum_{\mu=1,-1}  \omega^2  
H = 2V\epsilon_0 \sum_\mathbf{k}\sum_{\mu=1,-1}  \omega^2  
  a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)\bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t).
  a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)\bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)\quad\hbox{with}\quad
\mathbf{k} = \frac{2\pi}{L} (n_x,\;n_y,\;n_z)\quad \hbox{and}\quad n_x,\; n_y,\; n_z = 0,\;\pm1,\;\pm2,\ldots
</math>
</math>


Line 135: Line 181:
\mathbf{P}_\textrm{EM} &\equiv \frac{1}{c^2} \iiint_V \mathbf{S}\, \textrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} =
\mathbf{P}_\textrm{EM} &\equiv \frac{1}{c^2} \iiint_V \mathbf{S}\, \textrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} =
\epsilon_0 \iiint_V \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)\times \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)\, \textrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}\\
\epsilon_0 \iiint_V \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)\times \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)\, \textrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}\\
&= 2 V \epsilon_0 \sum_\mathbf{k}\sum_{\mu=1,-1}  \omega \mathbf{k}
a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)\bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t).
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math>
</math>
To show that the expansion terms containing
:<math>
a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t)\;a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)
\iiint_V e^{i(\mathbf{k'}+\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{r}} \;\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} 
\quad\hbox{and}\quad
\bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t)\;\bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)
\iiint_V e^{-i (\mathbf{k'}+\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{r}} \;\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}
</math>
cancel, we write
:<math>
\mathbf{P}_\textrm{EM}  = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2}
\iiint_V\left( \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)\times \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)- \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)\times \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)\right)\, \textrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}
</math>
Upon expansion, one finds among other terms,
:<math>
\delta_{\mathbf{k'},-\mathbf{k}} a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t)\;a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)
\Big[
\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'})\times\left(\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \right)
-\left(\mathbf{k'}\times \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'}) \right)\times\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})
\Big]
</math>
Twice the [[Baccab formula]] and using that&nbsp; "under &delta;<sub><b>k'</b>,&minus;'''k'''</sub>" &nbsp; '''k''' and &minus;<b>k'</b> maybe interchanged, and an obvious short-hand notation gives
:<math>
\begin{align}
\mathbf{e}'\times(\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{e}) &=
\mathbf{k} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{e}) - \mathbf{e} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{k})=
\mathbf{k} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{e}) + \mathbf{e} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{k}')
=\mathbf{k} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{e}) \\
-(\mathbf{k}'\times \mathbf{e}')\times\mathbf{e} &= \mathbf{e}\times(\mathbf{k}'\times \mathbf{e}')=
\mathbf{k}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{e}') - \mathbf{e}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{k}')=
\mathbf{k}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{e}') + \mathbf{e}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{k})
=\mathbf{k}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{e}') . \\
\end{align}
</math>
And
:<math>
\delta_{\mathbf{k'},-\mathbf{k}}\;\left[ \mathbf{k} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{e}) + \mathbf{k}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{e}') \right] = 0 .
</math>
The other terms in the expansion do not offer any new problems, so that, finally,
:<math>
\mathbf{P}_\textrm{EM}  = 2 V \epsilon_0 \sum_\mathbf{k}\sum_{\mu=1,-1}  \omega \mathbf{k}
a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)\bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)\quad\hbox{with}\quad
\mathbf{k} = \frac{2\pi}{L} (n_x,\;n_y,\;n_z)\quad \hbox{and}\quad n_x,\; n_y,\; n_z = 0,\;\pm1,\;\pm2,\ldots.
</math>
==Notes==
<references />

Latest revision as of 23:07, 30 November 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The electromagnetic (EM) field is of importance as a carrier of solar energy and of electronic signals (radio, TV, etc.). As its name suggests, it consists of two vector fields, the electric field E and the magnetic field B. The Fourier expansion of the electromagnetic field is used in the quantization that leads to photons (light particles of well-defined energy and momentum). Further the Fourier transforms of EM fields play a role in theory of wave propagation through different media and light scattering.

In the absence of charges and electric currents (that is, in "free" space), both E and B can be derived from a third vector field, the vector potential A. Below, the Fourier transform of the three real fields E, B, and A will be introduced. It will be seen that the expansion of the vector potential A yields the expansions of the fields E and B. Further the energy and momentum of the EM field will be expressed in the Fourier components of A.

Fourier expansion of a vector field

A real scalar function f(x), with 0 ≤ xL, has the following Fourier expansion:

where the bar indicates complex conjugation and the definition of the Fourier components is obvious. Note that the summand consists of a term plus its complex conjugate and hence is real. For a real scalar field f(r) depending on three variables, r ≡ (x, y, z), the Fourier expansion is easily generalized; it is the following:

Such an expansion, labeled by a discrete (countable) set of vectors k, is always possible when f satisfies periodic boundary conditions, i.e., f(r + p,t) = f(r,t) for some finite vector p. To impose such boundary conditions, it is common to consider EM waves as if they are in a virtual cubic box of finite volume V = L3. Waves on opposite walls of the box are enforced to have the same value (usually zero). Note that the waves are not restricted to the box: the box is replicated an infinite number of times in x, y, and z direction.

The expansion above is over the first octant of the (kx, ky, kz) lattice. It is often extended to run over all octants, in which case an overcomplete (linearly dependent, not completely orthogonal) basis is used. When furthermore the expansion is applied to the three components of a vector field F(r,t) separately, the result can be written concisely as follows:

with the following orthogonality relations,[1]

Vector potential

The magnetic field B satisfies the following Maxwell equation:

that is, the divergence of B is zero. This equation expresses the fact that magnetic monopoles (charges) do not exist (or, rather, have never been found in nature). A divergence-free field, such as B, is a also referred to as a transverse field. By the Helmholtz decomposition, B can be written as

in which the vector potential A is introduced though the curl ×A.

The electric field obeys one of the Maxwell equations, in electromagnetic SI units it reads,

because it is assumed that charge distributions ρ are zero. The quantity ε0 is the electric constant. Hence, also the electric field E is transverse. Since there are no charges, the electric potential is zero and the electric field follows from A by,

The fact that E can be written this way is due to the choice of Coulomb gauge for A:

By definition, a choice of gauge does not affect any measurable properties (the best known example of a choice of gauge is the fixing of the zero of an electric potential, for instance at infinity). The Coulomb gauge makes A transverse as well, and clearly A is parallel to E. (The time differentiation does not affect direction.) The vector fields A, B, and E are in the same plane, as they are orthogonal to the same longitudinal vector. Hence, the three fields can be written as a linear combination of two orthonormal vectors, ex and ey. It is often convenient to choose complex unit vectors obtained by a unitary transformation,

which are orthonormal,

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}\cdot\bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu')} = \delta_{\mu,\mu'}\quad\hbox{with}\quad\mu,\mu'= 1,\, -1, }

and the bar indicating the complex conjugate.

Expansions

The Fourier expansion of the vector potential reads

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \sum_\mathbf{k}\sum_{\mu=-1,1} \left( \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} + \bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right). }

The vector potential obeys the wave equation,

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \nabla^2 \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t) = \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)}{\partial t^2} }

The substitution of the Fourier series of A into the wave equation yields for the individual terms,

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle -k^2 a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) = \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial^2 a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)}{\partial t^2} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \propto e^{-i\omega t}\quad\hbox{with}\quad\omega = kc\quad\hbox{and}\quad k \equiv |\mathbf{k}|. }

It is now an easy matter to construct the corresponding Fourier expansions for E and B from the expansion of the vector potential A. The expansion for E follows from differentiation with respect to time,

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = i\sum_\mathbf{k}\sum_{\mu=-1,1} \omega \left( \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} - \bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right) . }

The expansion for B follows by taking the curl,

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}, t) = i\sum_\mathbf{k}\sum_{\mu=-1,1} \left( \big[\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})\big]\; a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} - \big[\mathbf{k}\times\bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})\big]\; \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right) . }

Fourier-expanded energy

The electromagnetic energy density is

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathcal{E}_\mathrm{Field} = \frac{1}{2} ( \epsilon_0 \mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{E}+ \frac{1}{\mu_0}\mathbf{B}\cdot\mathbf{B}), }

where μ0 is the magnetic constant. The total energy (classical Hamiltonian) of a finite volume V is defined by

Use in the expansion of EE = E2 the following

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \frac{1}{V}\iiint_V &\left( \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'}) a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t) \, e^{i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}} - \bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'}) \bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k'}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right) \cdot \left( \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} - \bar{\mathbf{e}}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \, e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right)\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} \\ &= -2\delta_{\mathbf{k'},\mathbf{k}}\delta_{\mu',\mu}\,a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t)\;+\; \delta_{\mathbf{k'},-\mathbf{k}} \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \left[a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k}(t) a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{-k}(t) + \bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k}(t) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{-k}(t)\right] \end{align} }

The first term (linear in δk',k) will survive and will be added to the same term appearing in the expansion of B2. It may be tempting to consider what the value will be of the following factor,

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}), }

(appearing in the second term, linear in δk',−k), but this is not needed, because it cancels against the very same expression arising in the expansion of B2.

In the expansion of B2 the following appears as the factor of   Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k}(t) a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{-k}(t)}   and  Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k}(t) \bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{-k}(t): }

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \delta_{\mathbf{k},-\mathbf{k}'} & \left[\mathbf{k'}\times\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'})\right]\cdot \left[\mathbf{k}\times\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})\right] =\delta_{\mathbf{k},-\mathbf{k}'} \left[ -\big(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{k}\big) \big(\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})\big) \right] - \left[ -\big(\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k})\big) \big(\mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{k})\big) \right] \\ &= -k^2\;\delta_{\mathbf{k},-\mathbf{k}'}\; \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(-\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \end{align} }

Recall that:

(i) The expression of the field energy E2 contains a factor ε0 and B2 the factor 1/μ0.

(ii)  Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \frac{k^2}{\mu_0} = \frac{\omega^2}{c^2\mu_0} = \frac{\epsilon_0\mu_0 \omega^2}{\mu_0} = \epsilon_0 \omega^2. }

(iii) The Fourier expansion of E contains the factor ω.

This means that all ingredients have been mentioned to arrive at the classical Hamiltonian in terms of Fourier coefficients,

Fourier-expanded momentum

The electromagnetic momentum, PEM, of EM radiation enclosed by a volume V is proportional to an integral of the Poynting vector S. In SI units:

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \mathbf{P}_\textrm{EM} &\equiv \frac{1}{c^2} \iiint_V \mathbf{S}\, \textrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} = \epsilon_0 \iiint_V \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)\times \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)\, \textrm{d}^3\mathbf{r}\\ \end{align} }

To show that the expansion terms containing

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t)\;a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \iiint_V e^{i(\mathbf{k'}+\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{r}} \;\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} \quad\hbox{and}\quad \bar{a}^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t)\;\bar{a}^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \iiint_V e^{-i (\mathbf{k'}+\mathbf{k})\cdot\mathbf{r}} \;\mathrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} }

cancel, we write

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbf{P}_\textrm{EM} = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \iiint_V\left( \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)\times \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)- \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)\times \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)\right)\, \textrm{d}^3\mathbf{r} }

Upon expansion, one finds among other terms,

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \delta_{\mathbf{k'},-\mathbf{k}} a^{(\mu')}_\mathbf{k'}(t)\;a^{(\mu)}_\mathbf{k}(t) \Big[ \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'})\times\left(\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \right) -\left(\mathbf{k'}\times \mathbf{e}^{(\mu')}(\mathbf{k'}) \right)\times\mathbf{e}^{(\mu)}(\mathbf{k}) \Big] }

Twice the Baccab formula and using that  "under δk',−k"   k and −k' maybe interchanged, and an obvious short-hand notation gives

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \mathbf{e}'\times(\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{e}) &= \mathbf{k} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{e}) - \mathbf{e} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{k})= \mathbf{k} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{e}) + \mathbf{e} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{k}') =\mathbf{k} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{e}) \\ -(\mathbf{k}'\times \mathbf{e}')\times\mathbf{e} &= \mathbf{e}\times(\mathbf{k}'\times \mathbf{e}')= \mathbf{k}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{e}') - \mathbf{e}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{k}')= \mathbf{k}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{e}') + \mathbf{e}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{k}) =\mathbf{k}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{e}') . \\ \end{align} }

And

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \delta_{\mathbf{k'},-\mathbf{k}}\;\left[ \mathbf{k} (\mathbf{e}'\cdot \mathbf{e}) + \mathbf{k}' (\mathbf{e}\cdot \mathbf{e}') \right] = 0 . }

The other terms in the expansion do not offer any new problems, so that, finally,

Notes

  1. In many textbooks, the second and third non-orthogonality are overlooked, but since they happen to give terms that mutually cancel, the end result is always correct. However, the necessary proofs of these cancellations complicate the derivations.