Young earth creationism: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 08:53, 11 June 2023

History

The most popular creationist chronology was originally developed in 17th century England by Archbishop James Ussher, an Anglican, in 1651. (Many other dates had been calculated by similar methods.) Ussher calculated, using the chronologies given in the books of the Bible, that the first day of creation occurred on October 23, 4004 BC. His chronology appeared in the margins of English Bibles starting in 1701; however, the year 4004 BC was already well known among theologians.^[1]

The Biblical story was not a contentious issue until the 19th century, when theologians started reinterpreting the Bible as a historical document (rather than divine revelation), and geologists such as James Hutton and Charles Lyell developed evidence, based on their analysis of geological processes and formations, the earth was not a few thousand years old but, in fact, several millions of years old. The appearance of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species in 1859 and the associated Theory of Evolution, provided evidence that life was much older than 6,000 years. Most Protestant theologians by 1900, including those opposed to the theory of evolution, rejected the 4004 BC model and argued the earth was very old. Many evangelical theologians adopted a figurative interpretation of the first two chapters of Genesis.^[2]

The Scopes trial

By 1910 a new theology of "fundamentalism" had emerged among conservative Protestants, especially in the Southern Baptist church in the U.S. The theory of evolution had no role for God, and fundamentalists saw this as a threat to their core beliefs, and launched a campaign in the 1920s to stop the teaching of evolution, a campaign that continues into the 21st century.

They revived the 4004 BC dating and organized political opposition to the teaching of Darwinism in the public schools. The Scopes trial took place in Tennessee, in 1925 and was seen as a watershed event in the creation-evolution controversy.^[3]

A law passed in March 1925 in Tennessee made it unlawful for any teacher in any of the public schools of the state to teach any theory that "denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals." The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) began a campaign to challenge this law and sought someone who would be prepared to admit to teaching evolution in a state school and stand trial so that the law could be challenged in court. John T. Scopes volunteered to play that part. William Jennings Bryan, three-time presidential nominee dominated the prosecution, while famed criminal lawyer Clarence Darrow dominated the defense. Reporters from across the world covered the sensational trial, especially when Darrow made Bryan a witness and questioned him about Biblical stories, such as Jonah and the whale. Although Scopes lost the trial (his conviction was reversed), the resulting publicity brought the issue to the forefront of the minds of the American people and fundamentalists saw it as a humiliating set-back for their campaign.^[4]

Modern-day young Earth creationism

The modern resurgence of young Earth creationism was due to two American theologians, John C. Whitcomb, Jr. and Henry M. Morris, and their book The Genesis Flood (1961). They in turn borrowed heavily from George McCready Price, a self-taught Seventh-day Adventist author of The New Geology (1923). (They borrowed Price's theory about Noah's flood, but rejected his theology which downplayed the importance of the date of creation.) ^[5]

Several organisations promote the idea of young Earth creationism. Some of the most prominent ones are Answers In Genesis [8], Creation Ministries International [9] and the Institute for Creation Research [10]. Although many organizational efforts have been undertaken in the last 80 years, especially by the Moody Bible Institute of Chicago, they have always collapsed in the face of bitter internal disputes among creationists. There are multiple "Noah flood" theories (none of which are supported by published scientific research.) As one creationist laments, "Unfortunately the situation in astronomy is not as good. As with biology and geology, astronomy has become permeated with evolutionary assumptions and conclusions. Unlike those other disciplines, there is no overall theory or, if you will, paradigm, of astronomy from a creationist perspective. Part of the problem has been the lack of researchers in the field."^[6]

Tenets

There is no single, agreed viewpoint of young earth creationism (YEC) or single source of authority for YEC doctrine. There can be found a variety of viewpoints among believers which may or may not be supported by those who are considered to be authorities on the subject. Furthermore, no theories have been published in peer-reviewed journals in support of young earth creationism. As such, it is difficult to define precisely what young earth creationism is. However, a number of themes and ideas have commonly surfaced in writings on the topic; a few of these are addressed below.

* Age of the Universe: Some proponents hold to the view that the Universe appears older than it is because the creator created the Universe with the appearance of age; for example, light from stars billions of light-years away created in transit so as to be visible to the first humans on the relevant day of creation. Physicist and creationist Russell Humphreys attempted to provide an alternative explanation for this problem in his book "Starlight and Time" by combining ideas from Einstein's Theory of Relativity and Biblical descriptions of God's creative works in Psalm 104:2^[7]. This view gained much support from YEC organisations, though it was not without much opposition from other (mostly old earth) creationists.

* Age of the Earth: YEC geological hypotheses tend to rest heavily on the global flood referred to in Genesis 6-8.^[8] Processes such as fossilization, the order of fossil layers, the formation of coal and discrepancies in radiocarbon dating are often attributed to the presence and pressure of the many tons of water that would have existed during such a cataclysmic event. Geological features such as the Grand Canyon, rather than being formed in a slow process over millions of years, are said to have formed much more quickly because of the forces resulting from the movement of these very large bodies of water.

* The vapor canopy: A hypothetical "vapor canopy" is proposed as one source of water for the global flood (the other being water under the ground). This idea is based on statements made in Genesis 1:6-8^[9] and Genesis 7:11^[10] and the belief that above the Earth's surface within the atmosphere a large amount of water could have existed in vapor form and that these waters were the source of the rainfall that preceded the flood of Genesis 7. This canopy has also been proposed as an explanation for the extraordinary longevity of the early Bible characters, attributing their long lifespans to the more favorable conditions of a higher atmospheric pressure, stable tropical weather system and resultant lack of disease. The vapor canopy hypothesis, however, has since been rejected by several prominent YEC organizations and figures.^[11]^[12]

Creation Museum

In 2007, Answers In Genesis opened the Creation Museum [11] near Cincinnati, Ohio. The museum generated much interest and controversy in the press and media.^[13]. The museum was designed by Patrick Marsh, who also designed the Jaws and King Kong exhibits at Universal Studios, Florida ^[14]

Other groups in the United States have announced similar museums. The Creation Discovery Museum [12] was opened by the Creation Studies Institute [13], a Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based ministry that promotes young Earth creationism. ^[15]

Criticisms

Scientists reject young Earth creationism, which it sees as a religious doctrine.^[16] Religious creationists who believe in old Earth creationism also reject the assertion that the Earth is only approximately 6,000 – 10,000 years old.

Popular support

Despite the fact that creationism has been rejected by scientists, it has a strong following within the United States and many Muslim nations. Two Gallup polls conducted in 1991 and 1997 in the United States found that approximately 45% of the population believed in a form of young earth creationism, and approximately 40% of the population supported the notion of a God-guided process of evolution (commonly referred to as theistic evolution).

References

↑ J. G. C. M. Fuller, "A date to remember: 4004 BC," Earth sciences history 2005, vol. 24, no1, pp. 5-14
↑ Numbers (2000)
↑ Numbers (2006)
↑ Larson (2006); State v. John Scopes ("The Monkey Trial") by Douglas O. Linder, [1]
↑ Price wrote in 1917, "The question of how much time was occupied in the work of Creation is of no importance, neither is the question of how long ago it took place. The one essential idea is that in its nature Creation is essentially inscrutable; we can never hope to know just how it was accomplished; we cannot expect to know the process or the details, for we have nothing with which to measure it. The one essential thing in the doctrine of Creation is that the origin of our world and of the things upon it came about at some period of time in the past by a direct and unusual manifestation of Divine power; " (quoted in [2]); Numbers (2006)
↑ Danny R. Falkner, "The Current State of Creation Astronomy." (1998) online at [3]
↑ 104:2
↑ [4]
↑ [5]
↑ [6]
↑ http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_lv_r05/
↑ http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/tools/flood-waters.asp
↑ Associated Press, "New Bible-Based Museum Has Dinosaurs," in New York Times May 26, 2007.
↑ [7] (accessed on 8th August 2007).
↑ Creationism 'Lite': 'Intelligent design' proponents marry God and evolution. wire service dispatch in The Record (Bergen County, NJ), August 28, 2005
↑ Numbers (2006)

[1] J. G. C. M. Fuller, "A date to remember: 4004 BC," Earth sciences history 2005, vol. 24, no1, pp. 5-14

[2] Numbers (2000)

[3] Numbers (2006)

[4] Larson (2006); State v. John Scopes ("The Monkey Trial") by Douglas O. Linder, [1]

[5] Price wrote in 1917, "The question of how much time was occupied in the work of Creation is of no importance, neither is the question of how long ago it took place. The one essential idea is that in its nature Creation is essentially inscrutable; we can never hope to know just how it was accomplished; we cannot expect to know the process or the details, for we have nothing with which to measure it. The one essential thing in the doctrine of Creation is that the origin of our world and of the things upon it came about at some period of time in the past by a direct and unusual manifestation of Divine power; " (quoted in [2]); Numbers (2006)

[6] Danny R. Falkner, "The Current State of Creation Astronomy." (1998) online at [3]

[7] 104:2

[8] [4]

[9] [5]

[10] [6]

[11] ttp://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_lv_r05/

[12] ttp://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/tools/flood-waters.asp

[13] Associated Press, "New Bible-Based Museum Has Dinosaurs," in New York Times May 26, 2007.

[14] [7] (accessed on 8th August 2007).

[15] Creationism 'Lite': 'Intelligent design' proponents marry God and evolution. wire service dispatch in The Record (Bergen County, NJ), August 28, 2005

[16] Numbers (2006)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Young earth creationism''' is a fundamentalist Christian belief asserting that the origin of the universe and of life on earth was precisely revealed in the book of [[Genesis]] in the [[Bible]]. Taking a literal interpretion, proponents argue that the earth is only 6000 - 10, 000 years old.  Once a mainstream belief in parts of Protestant Europe, modern adherents to young earth creationism are at odds with majority Christian views about the world, and with the teachings of current science. Activists, especially in Australia, claim several supporters have credentials as scientists. <ref>See [http://www.creationists.org/outstanding.html List of Creation Scientists] </ref>  Few of these activists have training in biology, but they are opposed to what they call "Darwinism," and attack modern biology for its opposition to their beliefs. Viewing Genesis as the recorded word of God, adherents to young earth creationism are sure that the truth is known to them and, accordingly, are skeptical of the need for scientific research to support those views.
+{{subpages}}
+'''Young earth creationism''' (often referred to as "Biblical creationism", or simply [[creationism]]) is the name given to a set of beliefs espoused by some [[Fundamentalism|fundamentalist]] [[Protestantism|Protestants]] who assert that God created the universe in six 24-hour days.  Using literal [[hermeneutics]] to approach the Bible, particularly the book of [[Genesis]] as well as the genealogy of [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] chapter 1, proponents assert that the earth is only 6,000 – 10,000 years old.
-The creationist chronology was originally developed in 17th century England. Bishop Ussher, an Anglican, in 1651 argued that Adam’s birth came at 9 AM on October 23, 4004 BC, and his chronology appeared in English bibles starting in 1701.<ref>However, the year 4004 BC was already well known to theologians.   J. G. C. M. Fuller, "A date to remember: 4004 BC," ''Earth sciences history'' 2005, vol. 24, no1, pp. 5-14 </ref> Young earth creationism was the popular belief in much of Europe and North America, and was not a contentious issue until the 19th century, when geologists (such as [[James Hutton]] and [[Charles Lylle]])  published evidence that the earth was millions of years old. The publication of Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" in 1859 led to the acceptance of the diversity of living things as a result of evolution rather than by divine creation as depicted in Genesis. With the acceptance of the geologic time scale by scientists through out the world in the latter part of the 19th century, such  biblical interpretions were no longer viewed as accurate by more educated citizens, including the clergy. The 4004 date was abandoned in the 1870s by liberal theologians in the protestant church, and in 1890-1920 was abandoned by the conservatives and fundamentalists, who concluded the Bible does not speak to the age of the earth or the dates of Adam. <ref> Numbers (2000)</ref>  In other words, their interpretation of the bible was altered while they maintained their Christian faith.
+While other cultures and religions may hold similar views of a young Earth, the term "young Earth creationism," coined in the late 20th century, refers to the fundamentalist Protestant view.
-In the United States, by the early years of the 20th century, a wide gap in scientific literacy between the more educated and less religious populations of the cities and towns (particularly in the North), and the less educated and more traditionally religious populations of the countryside, (particularly in the rural South) became pronounced. In the southern United States, Christian fundamentalism grew rapidly after 1920, especially under the auspices of the Southern Baptist church, which included most Southern whites. The gap in scientific literacy between the groups was highlighted by "the events leading up to the famous Scopes trial in 1925, which found teacher John Scopes guilty of teaching evolution in violation of Tennessee law.  His conviction was later overturned on a technicality." (quote from Whose 'science' ?Craig Savoye, Special to The Christian Science Monitor, February 08, 2000 edition). National public attention towards the [[Scopes trial]] had spotlighted the disparity in world view between these social groups and turned those individuals who supported literal interpretations of the Bible into laughing stock in the eyes of the more urbane and sophisticated Americans. Such public ridicule alienated some of the religious fundamentalists, who then declared Darwinism was a profound source of evil. For these people, the result of the Scopes trial was further polarization away from contemporary norms of the more educated and secular Americans.    Fundamentalists feared that Christian teachings based on the Bible were under attack from secular forces that required the public schools to teach Darwinian biology. In this way, science education- particularly public school education in biology and the theory of evolution, became symbolic of a hostile secular movement  to undercut traditional moral values.
+==History==
+The most popular creationist chronology was originally developed in 17th century England by [[Archbishop James Ussher]], an [[Anglican]], in 1651. (Many other dates had been calculated by similar methods.) Ussher calculated, using the chronologies given in the books of the Bible, that the first day of creation occurred on October 23, 4004 BC. His chronology appeared in the margins of English Bibles starting in 1701; however, the year 4004 BC was already well known among theologians.<ref>J. G. C. M. Fuller, "A date to remember: 4004 BC," ''Earth sciences history'' 2005, vol. 24, no1, pp. 5-14</ref>
-Young earth creationism in its modern form was invented by two American theologians in the early 1960s, John C. Whitcomb, Jr. and Henry M. Morris, in ''The Genesis Flood'' (1961).  They in turn borrowed heavily (without attribution) from George McCready Price, a self-taught Seventh-day Adventist author of ''The New Geology'' (1923). Price was not trying to interpret the Bible; he was trying to justify the visions of [[Ellen G. White]], the founder of Seventh Day Adventism. Whitcomb and Morris modified Price's work by  dropping references to Adventism and adding a Baptist interpretation to Price's theory that a great flood had created all the fossils. The young earth creationism movement in the United States draws on a traditional Southern rural evangelical culture and exhibits a determined search for an alternative ethic not contaminated by secularism and Darwinism, which are seen as minions of Satan.  Thus the creationists excommunicated adherents of the idea that "days" in Genesis meant epochs, not 24-hour units. The movement is largely confined to Protestant [[fundamentalism|fundamentalists]], especially in the United States and Australia. The theory is most popular among militant [[Southern Baptists]] and [[Missouri Synod Lutherans]].  Adherence to these beliefs have separated the young earth creationism  proponents from more moderate fundamentalist Christians in internecine theological battles.<ref> Numbers 2006</ref>
+The Biblical story was not a contentious issue until the 19th century, when theologians started reinterpreting the Bible as a historical document (rather than divine revelation), and geologists such as [[James Hutton]] and [[Charles Lyell]] developed evidence, based on their analysis of geological processes and formations, the earth was not a few thousand years old but, in fact, several millions of years old.  The appearance of [[Charles Darwin]]'s ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'' in 1859 and the associated [[Evolution|Theory of Evolution]], provided evidence that life was much older than 6,000 years. Most Protestant theologians by 1900, including those opposed to the theory of evolution, rejected the 4004 BC model and argued the earth was very old. Many evangelical theologians adopted a figurative interpretation of the first two chapters of Genesis.<ref> Numbers (2000)</ref>
+===The Scopes trial===
+By 1910 a new theology of "fundamentalism" had emerged among conservative Protestants, especially in the Southern Baptist church in the U.S. The theory of evolution had no role for God, and fundamentalists saw this as a threat to their core beliefs, and launched a campaign in the 1920s to stop the teaching of evolution, a campaign that continues into the 21st century.
-The scientific community as a whole has rejected young earth creationism for more than a hundred years.  In addition, religious creationists who believe in [[old earth creationism]] also reject the assertion that the earth is only approximately 6000 years old. Young earth creationists allege that the evidence supporting their theories has been suppressed by mainstream science, and occasionally have brought lawsuits alleging censorship, one of them by Robert V. Gentry.
+They revived the 4004 BC dating and organized political opposition to the teaching of Darwinism in the public schools. The [[Scopes trial]] took place in [[Tennessee (U.S. state)|Tennessee]], in 1925 and was seen as a watershed event in the [[creation-evolution controversy]].<ref> Numbers (2006)</ref>
-Believers in 2007 opened the Creation Museum theme park near Cincinnati, Ohio, showing early humans at play alongside vegetarian dinosaurs.<ref> Associated Press, "New Bible-Based Museum Has Dinosaurs," in New York ''Times'' May 26, 2007 at [http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Creation-Museum.html?_r=1&oref=login]</ref> Other groups in the United States have had similar plans. The "Creation Discovery Center, a museum with exhibits on Noah's flood, the Ice Age and the dinosaurs (featured in the antediluvian room in a mural with Adam and Eve)" was opened by Creation Studies Institute, a Fort Lauderdale, Fla.-based ministry that promotes young earth creationism (Creationism 'lite'; 'Intelligent design' proponents marry God and evolution.<ref>  The Record (Bergen County, NJ), August 28, 2005 Sunday,  All Editions, OPINION; Pg. O01, 1680 words, By ALEXANDRA ALTER, Wire Services).</ref> The Creation Museum theme park is likely to remain a showcase for the movement, however. Planned by "a designer of amusement parks who created the Jaws and King Kong exhibits at Florida's Universal Studios, in a special-effects theater, the seats shake and visitors are sprinkled with water. There's a lush Garden of Eden, a partial re-creation of Noah's Ark, a slice of the Grand Canyon, lots of videos on plasma TVs, and a planetarium for exploring the universe. At Noah's Cafe, kids can saddle up on a triceratops." ( Jane Lampman:Natural history, Bible-style. Christian Science Monitor.May 24, 2007 edition)
+A law passed in March 1925 in Tennessee made it unlawful for any teacher in any of the public schools of the state to teach any theory that "denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals." The [[American Civil Liberties Union]] (ACLU) began a campaign to challenge this law and sought someone who would be prepared to admit to teaching evolution in a state school and stand trial so that the law could be challenged in court. [[John T. Scopes]] volunteered to play that part. [[William Jennings Bryan]], three-time presidential nominee dominated the prosecution, while famed criminal lawyer [[Clarence Darrow]] dominated the defense.  Reporters from across the world covered the sensational trial, especially when Darrow made Bryan a witness and questioned him about Biblical stories, such as Jonah and the whale. Although Scopes lost the trial (his conviction was reversed), the resulting publicity brought the issue to the forefront of the minds of the American people and fundamentalists saw it as a humiliating set-back for their campaign.<ref>Larson (2006); State v. John Scopes ("The Monkey Trial") by Douglas O. Linder, [http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/evolut.htm]</ref>
-==Notes==
+==Modern-day young Earth creationism==
-{{reflist}}
+The modern resurgence of young Earth creationism was due to two American theologians, [[John C. Whitcomb, Jr.]] and [[Henry M. Morris]], and their book ''[[The Genesis Flood]]'' (1961). They in turn borrowed heavily from George McCready Price, a self-taught [[Seventh-day Adventism|Seventh-day Adventist]] author of ''The New Geology'' (1923). (They borrowed Price's theory about Noah's flood,  but rejected his theology which downplayed the importance of the date of creation.) <ref>Price wrote in 1917, "The question of how much time was occupied in the work of Creation is of no importance, neither is the question of how long ago it took place. The one essential idea is that in its nature Creation is essentially inscrutable; we can never hope to know just how it was accomplished; we cannot expect to know the process or the details, for we have nothing with which to measure it. The one essential thing in the doctrine of Creation is that the origin of our world and of the things upon it came about at some period of time in the past by a direct and unusual manifestation of Divine power; " (quoted in [http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/CMBergman.html]); Numbers (2006)</ref>
-==Bibliography==
-* Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists'' (2nd ed. 2006)
+Several organisations promote the idea of young Earth creationism. Some of the most prominent ones are [[Answers In Genesis]][http://www.answersingenesis.org], [[Creation Ministries International]][http://www.creationontheweb.org] and the [[Institute for Creation Research]][http://www.icr.org/].  Although many organizational efforts  have been undertaken in the last 80 years, especially by the Moody Bible Institute of Chicago, they have always collapsed in the face of bitter internal disputes among creationists. There are multiple "Noah flood" theories (none of which are supported by published scientific research.) As one creationist laments, "Unfortunately the situation in astronomy is not as good. As with biology and geology, astronomy has become permeated with evolutionary assumptions and conclusions. Unlike those other disciplines, there is no overall theory or, if you will, paradigm, of astronomy from a creationist perspective. Part of the problem has been the lack of researchers in the field."<ref>Danny R. Falkner, "The Current State of Creation Astronomy." (1998) online at [http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=research&action=index&page=researchp_df_r01]</ref>
-**  James D. Bratt, "History of Brief Time" ''Reviews in American History,'' Vol. 22, No. 2 (Jun., 1994), pp. 335-339. (review of Numbers, 1992 edition. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0048-7511(199406)22%3A2%3C335%3AAHOBT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-5 online at JSTOR]
+===Tenets===
+There is no single, agreed viewpoint of young earth creationism (YEC) or single source of authority for YEC doctrine. There can be found a variety of viewpoints among believers which may or may not be supported by those who are considered to be authorities on the subject. Furthermore, no theories have been published in peer-reviewed journals in support of young earth creationism. As such, it is difficult to define precisely what young earth creationism is. However, a number of themes and ideas have commonly surfaced in writings on the topic; a few of these are addressed below.
+'''* Age of the Universe:''' Some proponents hold to the view that the Universe appears older than it is because the creator created the Universe with the appearance of age; for example, light from stars billions of light-years away created in transit so as to be visible to the first humans on the relevant day of creation. Physicist and creationist Russell Humphreys attempted to provide an alternative explanation for this problem in his book "Starlight and Time" by combining ideas from Einstein's Theory of Relativity and Biblical descriptions of God's creative works in Psalm 104:2<ref>[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm 104:2]</ref>. This view gained much support from YEC organisations, though it was not without much opposition from other (mostly old earth) creationists.
+'''* Age of the Earth:''' YEC geological hypotheses tend to rest heavily on the global flood referred to in Genesis 6-8.<ref>[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%206-8;&version=31;]</ref> Processes such as fossilization, the order of fossil layers, the formation of coal and discrepancies in radiocarbon dating are often attributed to the presence and pressure of the many tons of water that would have existed during such a cataclysmic event. Geological features such as the Grand Canyon, rather than being formed in a slow process over millions of years, are said to have formed much more quickly because of the forces resulting from the movement of these very large bodies of water.
+'''* The vapor canopy:''' A hypothetical "vapor canopy" is proposed as one source of water for the global flood (the other being water under the ground). This idea is based on statements made in Genesis 1:6-8<ref>[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%201:6-8;]</ref> and Genesis 7:11<ref>[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%207:11;]</ref> and the belief that above the Earth's surface within the atmosphere a large amount of water could have existed in vapor form and that these waters were the source of the rainfall that preceded the flood of Genesis 7. This canopy has also been proposed as an explanation for the extraordinary longevity of the early Bible characters, attributing their long lifespans to the more favorable conditions of a higher atmospheric pressure, stable tropical weather system and resultant lack of disease. The vapor canopy hypothesis, however, has since been rejected by several prominent YEC organizations and figures.<ref>http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_lv_r05/</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/tools/flood-waters.asp</ref>
+===Creation Museum===
+In 2007, Answers In Genesis opened the [[Creation Museum]] [http://www.creationmuseum.org/] near Cincinnati, Ohio.  The museum generated much interest and controversy in the press and media.<ref> Associated Press, "New Bible-Based Museum Has Dinosaurs," in New York ''Times'' May 26, 2007.</ref>. The museum was designed by [[Patrick Marsh]], who also designed the [[Jaws]] and [[King Kong]] exhibits at [[Universal Studios]], Florida <ref> [http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,,1946370,00.html] (accessed on 8th August 2007). </ref>
-* Numbers, Ronald L. "The Most Important Biblical Discovery of Our Time": William Henry Green and the Demise of Ussher's Chronology," ''Church History,'' Vol. 69, No. 2 (Jun., 2000), pp. 257-276 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0009-6407%28200006%2969%3A2%3C257%3A%22MIBDO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage in JSTOR]
+Other groups in the United States have announced similar museums. The [[Creation Discovery Museum]][http://www.creationstudies.org/museum.html] was opened <!-- on which date? --> by the [[Creation Studies Institute]][http://www.creationstudies.org/], a Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based ministry that promotes young Earth creationism. <ref> Creationism 'Lite': 'Intelligent design' proponents marry God and evolution.  wire service dispatch in ''The Record'' (Bergen County, NJ), August 28, 2005 </ref>
-==External links==
+==Criticisms==
-*[http://nwcreation.net/ageyoung.html Northwest Creation Network] Summary of Biblical Young Earth Creationism, with numerous links
+Scientists reject young Earth creationism, which it sees as a religious doctrine.<ref> Numbers (2006)</ref>  Religious creationists who believe in [[old Earth creationism]] also reject the assertion that the Earth is only approximately 6,000 – 10,000 years old.<!-- citation needed -->
-*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/24/AR2005092401262.html In Evolution Debate, Creationists Are Breaking New Ground] ''Washington Post'' article on the Creation Museum (free registration required)
-*[http://www.creationists.org/ The Young Earth Creation Club] Arguments and publications from Young Earth creationists.
-*[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/creation.php godandscience.org] Young Earth vs. Old Earth arguments from Old Earth creationists.
+==Popular support==
+Despite the fact that creationism has been rejected by scientists, it has a strong following within the United States and many Muslim nations. Two Gallup polls conducted in 1991 and 1997 in the United States found that approximately 45% of the population believed in a form of young earth creationism, and approximately 40% of the population supported the notion of a God-guided process of evolution (commonly referred to as [[theistic evolution]]).
-[[category:CZ Live]]
+==References==
-[[category:Religion Workgroup]]
+{{reflist}}

Young earth creationism: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 08:53, 11 June 2023

Contents

History

The Scopes trial

Modern-day young Earth creationism

Tenets

Creation Museum

Criticisms

Popular support

References

Navigation menu

Young earth creationism: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 08:53, 11 June 2023

History

The Scopes trial

Modern-day young Earth creationism

Tenets

Creation Museum

Criticisms

Popular support

References

Navigation menu

Search