Michael O'Hanlon: Difference between revisions
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "[[Afghanistan War (2001-)" to "[[Afghanistan War (2001-2021)") |
John Leach (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | ||
{{ | |||
'''Michael O'Hanlon''' is Senior fellow in Foreign Policy at the [[Brookings Institution]], where he specializes in U.S. defense strategy, the use of military force, homeland security and American foreign policy. He is Director of Research in Foreign Policy and 21st Century Defense Initiative, and holds the Sydney Stein, Jr. Chair. | '''Michael O'Hanlon''' is Senior fellow in Foreign Policy at the [[Brookings Institution]], where he specializes in U.S. defense strategy, the use of military force, homeland security and American foreign policy. He is Director of Research in Foreign Policy and 21st Century Defense Initiative, and holds the Sydney Stein, Jr. Chair. | ||
Revision as of 10:33, 14 March 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | ||
---|---|---|
Michael O'Hanlon is Senior fellow in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, where he specializes in U.S. defense strategy, the use of military force, homeland security and American foreign policy. He is Director of Research in Foreign Policy and 21st Century Defense Initiative, and holds the Sydney Stein, Jr. Chair. He is a member of the State Department's International Security Advisory Board, United States Department of State and of the advisory council, Center for a New American Security, and is a visiting lecturer at Princeton University. He is a member of the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the Council on Foreign Relations. CounterinsurgencyIn May 2009, he coauthored a Brookings study on how to assess the progress in counterinsurgency and peace operations.
He has written sympathetically of the problems faced by commanders in the [[Afghanistan War (2001-2021), describing GEN Stanley McChrystal's public positions as reasonable concern for his troops. [2] Of the removal of GEN David McKiernan, [3] he said "Basically, McKiernan did a good job, but they need someone that they think can do an excellent job. In normal times, that would not be reason enough to relieve a four-star [general]. But, of course, these aren't ordinary times." With Jane Harman, he wrote that additional troops to Afghanistan had to be tied to Afghan government progress on reducing corruption.[4] They see corruption, specifically including fraud in the 2009 Afghanistan presidential election, as the most serious issue facing effective governance there. Previous career
Education
References
|