Peace operations

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article may be deleted soon.
To oppose or discuss a nomination, please go to CZ:Proposed for deletion and follow the instructions.

For the monthly nomination lists, see
Category:Articles for deletion.

Peace operations cover a wide range of activities that are needed in the sort of low-intensity conflict that may take place after the end of a conventional war between nation-states, a insurgency#civil war|civil war, or a state that has broken up into local militias.[1] Other terms are used in national doctrine, such as stability operations by the United States of America and low-intensity conflict by the United Kingdom.

The terminology is sufficiently vague that termss are not consistently written: "peacekeeping vs. peace keeping", "peacemaking vs. peace making", etc. Only "peace enforcement" seems always to be written as one word.

While every situation is unique, several types of activity are known:

  • Peace keeping: this involves having neutral observers separate the parties in dispute. The observers may or may not be armed. If armed, they are unlikely to be authorized to use weapons other than in self defense. This is a traditional United Nations role under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter.
  • Peace enforcement: From the United Nations standpoint, this is a Chapter VII military operation. In Thomas Barnett's paradigm,[2] if the area in conflict is occupied, or in civil war, a leviathan, or first-world military force that takes down the opposition regular forces. Leviathan is not constituted to fight local insurgencies, but major forces. Leviathan will be replaced by system administrator (see below).
  • Peace making: often through third-party mediation but preferably direct negotiations, this is the process of developing the consensus of the shape of peace, to be formalized by diplomats and politicians. The mediators may be citizens respected by all sides, or professional diplomats, or religious or some other kind of leader accepted as fair. [3]
  • Peace building, also called nation building. One description calls it "the process of normalizing relations and reconciling differences between all the citizens of the warring factions." Thomas Barnett calls it the system administrator, in his paradigm that failing states are disconnected from the "connected core" of developed nations. This often involves multinational ranging from demining to debt relief to preventive medicine.[2]
From the standpoint of the United Nations,

Among other provisions, the Charter contains two important sections to help its members "maintain international peace and security." Although the Charter never uses the word, the generic term for these measures is peacekeeping, the kinds of observer or truce supervisory missions that occurred after a conflict, when combatants wanted to have the benefit of a trusted third party to act as a buffer. Traditionally, these missions have been known as "Chapter VI actions," because that section of the Charter deals with the peaceful settlement of international disputes.

However, Chapter VII contains the term peace enforcement, referring to military intervention authorized by the U.N. Security Council— blockades, enforcement of sanctions, forceful disarmament, and direct military action. These categories haven't always fit situations that seemed to go beyond peacekeeping but stopped short of actual combat, so an informal term, "Chapter Six-and-a-Half," emerged to describe such activities as conflict prevention, demobilization, cantonment of weapons, and actions taken to guarantee freedom of movement within a country. Mostly because of Cold War rivalries, only 13 U.N. peacekeeping operations were approved between 1945 and 1987. With the winding down of the Cold War, however, 13 new ones (not including the peace enforcement operation in Somalia) were approved between 1987 and 1992. There is another important figure that will come as no surprise to anyone who has ever stepped in to break up a barracks fight—during this same time, more than 800 peacekeepers from 43 countries have been killed while serving under the U.N. flag.[4]

Consistency of objective

The disastrous operations in Somalia started as a well-intentioned humanitarian relief effort, but, without carefully redefining the operational requirements, suffered "mission creep", also called "strategic overreach". [5] The mission gradually became nation building, but without a consensus among various groups, who were quite prepared to respond with military force. [4]

Peace keeping

The United Nations Secretary General defines peace keeping as "the deployment of a United Nations presence in the field, hitherto with the consent of all the parties concerned involving UN military and/or police personnel and frequently civilians as well. Peacekeeping is a technique that expands the possibility for both the prevention of conflict and the making of peace."

Peace keeping must always support diplomacy. Its military compnent may include:

  • Withdrawals and Disengagements
  • Cease-fires
  • Prisoner-of-War Exchanges
  • Arms Control
  • Demilitarization and Demobilization

United Nations peacekeeping forces are invited by all sides, are multinational, and arrive after the fighting has ended... In the past, traditional peacekeeping was feasible because two conditions existed before peacekeepers were inserted: fighting had ceased, and both or all parties preferred the presence of the peacekeepers to their absence.[6]

One of the challenges of peacekeeping is protecting the peacekeepers. Standard military doctrine calls for visible force, and usually active patrolling around a base, not just passive defense. The U.S. rules of engagement in Beirut, at the time of the 1983 Beirut barracks bombings were to keep sentries in fixed positions close to the buildings, with ammunition carried but not in their rifles, and no weapons heavier than rifles.

Peace enforcement

In September 1993, Croatian forces in the Medak Pocket had assumed that they could drive of UN forces with a small amount of fire. While ethnic cleansing was continuing, however, the new UN Force Commander, French Lieutenant-General Jean Cot chose not to insert a few observers, but to send in a combat brigade-equivalent built around the Princess Patricia Canadian Light Infantry (a mechanized infantry regiment) supplemented with two companies of French mechanized infantry. This force caused the Croatians to back down. [7]

Peace making

"Peace making...combines negotiation with nonmilitary tools of coercion to achieve a resolution of a conflict. When these tools are inadequate, military tools may be used to establish and maintain, forcibly if necessary, a cessation of hostilities. ... peacemaking constitutes the political framework for application of military force. Without a peacemaking effort, peacekeeping and peace enforcement operations will always fail.

"Even if military force is authorized by the United Nations, all military operations involve continuous negotiation, with all parties, and at many different levels." [8]

Peace building

United Nations

Created by the United Nations General Assembly and United Nations Security Council resolution 60/180 and resolution 1645 (2005) of 20 December 2005, the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) is a new intergovernmental advisory body of the United Nations that supports peace efforts in countries emerging from conflict, and is a key addition to the capacity of the International Community in the broad peace agenda.[9]

PBC is seen as filling a gap in the existing UN peace structure, by bringing together the government of a specific country together with all the relevant international and national actors to discuss and decide on a long-term peacebuilding strategy with the aim of preventing a relapse into conflict. It does have funds that can be disbursed to assist the process. With the development of such a strategy, available funds will be spent more effectively and efficiently and will close the gap between immediate post-conflict efforts on the one hand, and long-term recovery and development efforts on the other.

The Peacebuilding Commission plays a unique role in

  1. bringing together all of the relevant actors, including international donors, the international financial institutions, national governments, troop contributing countries;
  2. marshalling resources and
  3. advising on and proposing integrated strategies for post-conflict peacebuilding and recovery and where appropriate, highlighting any gaps that threaten to undermine peace.

It is specifically mandated to:

  • Propose integrated strategies for post-conflict peacebuilding and recovery;
  • Help to ensure predictable financing for early recovery activities and sustained financial investment over the medium- to longer-term;
  • Extend the period of attention the international community gives to post-conflict recovery;
  • Develop best practices on issues that require extensive collaboration among political, security, humanitarian and development actors.

UK and Russia

A joint effort between the British group Peacebuilding UK [10], and the Russian Charitable Fund ‘Centre for Peacebuilding and Community Development’, focuses on peacebuilding in the North Caucasus. [11] The Russian partner has offices in Chechnya, Ingushetia, North Ossetia and Dagestan. The joint focus includes psychosocial, peacebuilding and community development work, including support of the ‘Daimohk’ dance ensemble in Chechnya. Dance, according to Ramzan Akhmadov, former star of the Chechen National Ballet and Celebrated Artist of the Russian Federation - and his wife Aiza, a dancer and choreographer, is a way to give a generation of children surrounded by violence and aggression a positive creative focus and emotional self-expression.


  1. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (17 October 2007), Joint Publication 3-07.3, Peace Operations
  2. 2.0 2.1 Barnett, Thomas P.M. (2005). The Pentagon's New Map: The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century. Berkley Trade. Barnett-2005. 
  3. International Online Training Program On Intractable Conflict, Peacemaking, Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, USA
  4. 4.0 4.1 Allard, Kenneth (January 1995), Chapter I. The Operational Concept, Somalia Operations: Lessons Learned, U.S. National Defense University Press
  5. Iklé, Fred Charles (2005 revised edition), Every War Must End, Columbia University Press
  6. U.S. Army Center for Lessons Learned, Chapter 2, Peacekeeping, Operations other than War, vol. Volume IV, Peace Operations
  7. Windsor, Lee A., Peace Enforcement Operations, Conference of Defence Associations (Canada)
  8. U.S. Army Center for Lessons Learned, Chapter 1, Peacemaking, Operations other than War, vol. Volume IV, Peace Operations
  9. United Nations Peacebuilding Commission
  10. full name ‘Centre for Peacebuilding and Community Development’
  11. Peacebuilding UK: About Us