User talk:Jonathan B. Rubinstein: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
would you be available to guide content development at the WikiLeaks article? This article involves Howard Berkowitz and and Martin Baldwin-Edwards, who are both Editors on the article, but far from an agreement on how its content should be structured, weighed, phrased and sourced. As a Politics Editors, I think you would be well positioned to provide guidance on the matter. Thank you! --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 15:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | would you be available to guide content development at the WikiLeaks article? This article involves Howard Berkowitz and and Martin Baldwin-Edwards, who are both Editors on the article, but far from an agreement on how its content should be structured, weighed, phrased and sourced. As a Politics Editors, I think you would be well positioned to provide guidance on the matter. Thank you! --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 15:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Let me be quite clear for all of you on this. i am not an author on that article. I intervened to ask its principal author to deal with bias, poor structure, missing facts, irrelevant facts etc. He refused. The situation is very similar to the Josef Mengele case, where Howard also refused to amend to conform with CZ neutrality policy. His appeal subsequently to Russell Jones led to Russell concurring 100% with my criticisms. As far as I am aware, all of my editorial judgements have been upheld by other editors here -- with the sole exception of Howard.[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 15:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:42, 6 December 2010
Welcome!
Welcome, new editor! We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a quick start. Also, when you get a chance, please read The Editor Role. You can look at Getting Started for other helpful introductory pages. It is essential for you as an editor to join the Citizendium-Editors mailing list in order to stay abreast of editor-related issues. If you wish, just ask me to create a "personal sandbox" for you where you can test out editing and writing articles. If you need help to get going, it is a good idea to join our discussion forums. That's where we discuss policy, proposals or technical problems. You can ask any constable for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see you begin actively editing and contributing to Citizendium. Milton Beychok 02:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
History editor input needed
There is a complex controversy over appropriate terminology and neutrality policy starting in the article on Josef Mengele and spilling over to War crime and perhaps other places I am not aware of. Input from history editors might be helpful. Sandy Harris 03:23, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Editorial guidance for WikiLeaks
Dear Jonathan,
would you be available to guide content development at the WikiLeaks article? This article involves Howard Berkowitz and and Martin Baldwin-Edwards, who are both Editors on the article, but far from an agreement on how its content should be structured, weighed, phrased and sourced. As a Politics Editors, I think you would be well positioned to provide guidance on the matter. Thank you! --Daniel Mietchen 15:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Let me be quite clear for all of you on this. i am not an author on that article. I intervened to ask its principal author to deal with bias, poor structure, missing facts, irrelevant facts etc. He refused. The situation is very similar to the Josef Mengele case, where Howard also refused to amend to conform with CZ neutrality policy. His appeal subsequently to Russell Jones led to Russell concurring 100% with my criticisms. As far as I am aware, all of my editorial judgements have been upheld by other editors here -- with the sole exception of Howard.Martin Baldwin-Edwards 15:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)