User:Howard C. Berkowitz/J: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| title = The Terror Presidency | publisher = W.W. Norton | year = 2007}}, p. 21</ref> the '''judicialization of international politics''',<ref name=Romano>{{citation | | title = The Terror Presidency | publisher = W.W. Norton | year = 2007}}, p. 21</ref> the '''judicialization of international politics''',<ref name=Romano>{{citation | ||
| title = From the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent | journal = New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers | author = Cesare P.R. Romano | year = 2006 | issue = 20 | | title = From the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent | journal = New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers | author = Cesare P.R. Romano | year = 2006 | issue = 20 | ||
| url = http://lsr.nellco.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=nyu/plltwp}}</ref> or, as a title of discussion, ''Foreign Law, Domestic Courts, and World Politics'', | | url = http://lsr.nellco.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=nyu/plltwp}}</ref> or, as a title of discussion, ''Foreign Law, Domestic Courts, and World Politics'',<ref>{{citation | ||
| title = Foreign Law, Domestic Courts, and World Politics | |||
| author = Christopher A. Whytock | |||
Department of Political Science | |||
Duke University | |||
chris.whytock@duke.edu | |||
www.duke.edu/~caw20 | |||
March 14, 2006 | |||
| url = http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=14&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.duke.edu%2F~caw20%2Fwhytock-foreign%2520law%2520domestic%2520courts%2520world%2520politics-031406.pdf&ei=V8D1SdSlM9LJtgeuk4CrDw&usg=AFQjCNEI6xfc2_OyoIfqAhxn2Jj-3NMqzQ}}</ref> | |||
==U.S. issues== | ==U.S. issues== | ||
Revision as of 10:01, 27 April 2009
Template:TOC-right Variously called the judicialization of international relations,[1] the judicialization of international politics,[2] or, as a title of discussion, Foreign Law, Domestic Courts, and World Politics,[3]
U.S. issues
In 1997, Jack Goldsmith wrote several papers on the relationships among international law, politics, and U.S. policy. One questioned the "modern position" that customary international law has the status of U.S. federal statutes. [4] He and Curtis Bradley elaborated that the U.S. courts should not allow international humanitarian law, in particular, to supercede the decisions of the Legislative and Executive Branches of the U.S. government. [5]
References
- ↑ Jack Goldsmith (2007), The Terror Presidency, W.W. Norton, p. 21
- ↑ Cesare P.R. Romano (2006), "From the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent", New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers (no. 20)
- ↑ Christopher A. Whytock Department of Political Science Duke University chris.whytock@duke.edu www.duke.edu/~caw20 March 14, 2006, Foreign Law, Domestic Courts, and World Politics
- ↑ Goldsmith, Jack Landman & Curtis Bradley (1997), "Customary International Law as Federal Common Law: A Critique of the Modern Position", Harvard Law Review 110: 815
- ↑ Goldsmith, Jack Landman & Curtis Bradley (1997), "The Current Illegitimacy of International Human Rights Litigation", Fordham Law Review 66: 319