Talk:George W. Bush: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(CZ should list only major items (there are zillions of small events to ignore in short list))
imported>Jeffrey Greer
m (Neutrality suggestion.)
Line 22: Line 22:
:::I agree, the real estate thing and a lot of other "markers" were added by Richard. Also I don't know why the Plame intelligence leakage Affair and NSA wiretapping scandal were erased, are they not important enough? [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 19:55, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
:::I agree, the real estate thing and a lot of other "markers" were added by Richard. Also I don't know why the Plame intelligence leakage Affair and NSA wiretapping scandal were erased, are they not important enough? [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 19:55, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
::The Plame scandal was not important enough. (The prospect it would bring down Rove would make it impoirtant but that did NOT happen.)  NSA wiretapping issue was minor affair likewise. The real estate boom affected tens of millions of people (and seems to have ended now, but was a major factor in the economy for years). What we have in the article is just a list of markers ("events" is not quite the word), with only a couple words on each.  A real article on the Bush years will have a paragraph+ on each item. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:05, 29 April 2007 (CDT)
::The Plame scandal was not important enough. (The prospect it would bring down Rove would make it impoirtant but that did NOT happen.)  NSA wiretapping issue was minor affair likewise. The real estate boom affected tens of millions of people (and seems to have ended now, but was a major factor in the economy for years). What we have in the article is just a list of markers ("events" is not quite the word), with only a couple words on each.  A real article on the Bush years will have a paragraph+ on each item. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:05, 29 April 2007 (CDT)
Someone needs to invoke the neutrality principle for this article.

Revision as of 10:28, 29 April 2007


Article Checklist for "George W. Bush"
Workgroup category or categories Politics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Robert Winmill 15:49, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This needs much improvement.

For starters, it should at least be stated that Bush lost the popular vote in his first election, though he won the the Electoral College.

The statement "reelected by 3 million majority over John Kerry in 2004" is misleading; the figure should include popular and electoral vote, and express the popular vote not only as a number, but as a percentage of votes cast (3 million makes the result sound less close than it was).

Russell Potter 15:50, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

I just fixed it. :-)
Looks much better! I do think it may be tricky to have the best overall information on a person who is still living and still serving as president -- that real estate boom may soon be (or may already be) a bust! -- but it's certainly worth trying. It will give us all a course of isometrics in the school of NPOV. Russell Potter 18:45, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
I agree, the real estate thing and a lot of other "markers" were added by Richard. Also I don't know why the Plame intelligence leakage Affair and NSA wiretapping scandal were erased, are they not important enough? Yi Zhe Wu 19:55, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
The Plame scandal was not important enough. (The prospect it would bring down Rove would make it impoirtant but that did NOT happen.) NSA wiretapping issue was minor affair likewise. The real estate boom affected tens of millions of people (and seems to have ended now, but was a major factor in the economy for years). What we have in the article is just a list of markers ("events" is not quite the word), with only a couple words on each. A real article on the Bush years will have a paragraph+ on each item. Richard Jensen 00:05, 29 April 2007 (CDT)

Someone needs to invoke the neutrality principle for this article.