User talk:Phil Wardle: Difference between revisions
imported>David Tribe No edit summary |
imported>Edward Buckner (Disruptive editors) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It happens Phil I have 12000 digital photos of Italy Phil, but few of Rome unfortunately. But I do have a love of Italian architecture dso look out for me as an asset if you see other cities in Italy being discussed cheers D [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 01:49, 23 January 2007 (CST) | It happens Phil I have 12000 digital photos of Italy Phil, but few of Rome unfortunately. But I do have a love of Italian architecture dso look out for me as an asset if you see other cities in Italy being discussed cheers D [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 01:49, 23 January 2007 (CST) | ||
== Disruptive editors == | |||
Hello - I finally joined after tendentious editing at Wikipedia got too much. First question, how is that issue dealt with here? Everyone at the 'other place' agrees that the problem is not so much the obvious trolls, but the ones who stick by the rules, just, but make life painful for other editors by repetitive questions, tendentious editing, filling up talk pages with nonsense, Wikilawyering the most obvious points. | |||
Is there anything like a 'moderator' function here? I.e. the power to terminate protracted threads or 'calling time' when the discussion is not fulfilling the purpose of getting the article written? [[User:Edward buckner|Edward buckner]] 02:37, 13 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 03:37, 13 February 2007
It happens Phil I have 12000 digital photos of Italy Phil, but few of Rome unfortunately. But I do have a love of Italian architecture dso look out for me as an asset if you see other cities in Italy being discussed cheers D David Tribe 01:49, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Disruptive editors
Hello - I finally joined after tendentious editing at Wikipedia got too much. First question, how is that issue dealt with here? Everyone at the 'other place' agrees that the problem is not so much the obvious trolls, but the ones who stick by the rules, just, but make life painful for other editors by repetitive questions, tendentious editing, filling up talk pages with nonsense, Wikilawyering the most obvious points.
Is there anything like a 'moderator' function here? I.e. the power to terminate protracted threads or 'calling time' when the discussion is not fulfilling the purpose of getting the article written? Edward buckner 02:37, 13 February 2007 (CST)