Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free. Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks AUGUST 2014 donors; special to Darren Duncan. SEPTEMBER 2014 donations open; need minimum total $100. Let's exceed that. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to August content contributors. --




Monolithic versus Microkernel

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium

Jump to: navigation, search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and not meant to be cited; by editing it you can help to improve it towards a future approved, citable version. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.

In computers, the core of an operating system is called a kernel. There are two main types of kernels: monolithic, in which the kernel is one, massive program, and microkernel, which takes the approach of running a very small kernel that interacts with lots of other small programs. In the case of a microkernel, the kernel acts as more of a central unit that keeps the other programs interacting with each other correctly.

Other types of kernels include hybrid monolithic kernels, which are a compromise between monolithic and microkernels, nanokernels, which have little to no drivers and support inside the kernel binary, and exokernels, which attempt to avoid forcing abstraction on programmers and their creations yet keeping security as much as possible.

Many debates have arisen throughout the years over which is the superior architecture, most notably that between Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, and Andrew Tanenbaum, the creator of Minix.

Views
Personal tools