NOTICE: Citizendium is still being set up on its newer server, treat as a beta for now; please see here for more.
Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free. Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. --

Moller-Plesset

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
(Redirected from Møller-Plesset)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and not meant to be cited; by editing it you can help to improve it towards a future approved, citable version. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.

Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP) is one of several quantum chemistry post-Hartree-Fock ab initio methods in the field of computational chemistry. It improves on the Hartree-Fock method by adding electron correlation effects by means of Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory (RS-PT), usually to second (MP2), third (MP3) or fourth (MP4) order. Its main idea was published as early as 1934.[1]

In Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory (RS-PT) one considers an unperturbed Hamiltonian operator to which is added a small (often external) perturbation :

,

where λ is an arbitrary real parameter. In MP-theory the zeroth-order wave function is an exact eigenfunction of the Fock operator or of a Fock operator shifted by a constant. This operator serves as the unperturbed operator. The MP perturbation, known as the correlation potential, is the difference of the exact electronic Hamiltonian and the unperturbed (zeroth-order) operator.


Møller-Plesset perturbation

Original formulation

The MP-energy corrections are obtained from Rayleigh-Schrödinger (RS) perturbation theory with the perturbation (correlation potential):

where the normalized Slater determinant Φ0 is the lowest eigenfunction of the Fock operator

Here N is the number of electrons of the molecule under consideration, H is the usual electronic Hamiltonian, is the one-electron Fock operator, and εi is the orbital energy belonging to the doubly occupied spatial orbital φi. The shifted Fock operator

serves as the unperturbed (zeroth-order) operator.

The Slater determinant Φ0 being an eigenfunction of F, it follows readily that

so that the zeroth-order energy is the expectation value of H with respect to Φ0, i.e., the Hartree-Fock energy:

Since the first-order MP energy

is obviously zero, the lowest-order MP correlation energy appears in second order. This result is the Møller-Plesset theorem:[1] the correlation potential does not contribute in first-order to the exact electronic energy.

In order to obtain the MP2 formula for a closed-shell molecule, the second order RS-PT formula is written on basis of doubly-excited Slater determinants. (Singly-excited Slater determinants do not contribute because of the Brillouin theorem). After application of the Slater-Condon rules for the simplification of N-electron matrix elements with Slater determinants in bra and ket and integrating out spin, it becomes

where φi and φj are canonical occupied orbitals and φa and φb are canonical virtual orbitals. (Canonical orbitals diagonalize the Fock matrix). The quantities εi, εj, εa, and εb are the corresponding orbital energies. Clearly, through second-order in the correlation potential, the total electronic energy is given by the Hartree-Fock energy plus second-order MP correction: EEHF + EMP2. The solution of the zeroth-order MP equation (which by definition is the Hartree-Fock equation) gives the Hartree-Fock energy. The first non-vanishing perturbation correction beyond the Hartree-Fock treatment is the second-order energy.

Alternative formulation

Equivalent expressions are obtained by a slightly different partitioning of the Hamiltonian, which results in a different division of energy terms over zeroth- and first-order contributions, while for second- and higher-order energy corrections the two partitionings give identical results. The formulation is commonly used by chemists, who are now large users of these methods.[2] This difference is due to the fact, well-known in Hartree-Fock theory, that

(The Hartree-Fock energy is not equal to the sum of occupied-orbital energies). In the alternative partitioning one defines,

Clearly in this partitioning,

Obviously, the Møller-Plesset theorem does not hold in the sense that EMP1 ≠ 0. The solution of the zeroth-order MP equation is the sum of orbital energies. The zeroth plus first order correction yields the Hartree-Fock energy. As with the original formulation, the first non-vanishing perturbation correction beyond the Hartree-Fock treatment is the second-order energy. We reiterate that the second- and higher-order corrections are the same in both formulations.

An advantage of the original formulation of the perturbation arises from the observation that the third-order (MP3) energy contains a term that is proportional to the first-order energy. Since in the original partitioning the first-order MP energy vanishes, the third-order MP energy has a simpler expression in the original formulation than in the alternative formulation.

Use of Møller-Plesset perturbation methods

Second (MP2), third (MP3), and fourth (MP4) order Møller-Plesset calculations are standard levels used in calculating small systems and are implemented in many computational chemistry codes. Higher level MP calculations, generally only MP5, are possible in some codes. However, they are rarely used because of their costs.

Systematic studies of MP perturbation theory have shown that it is not necessarily a convergent theory at high orders. The convergence properties can be slow, rapid, oscillatory, regular, highly erratic or simply non-existent, depending on the precise chemical system or basis set.[3] Additionally, various important molecular properties calculated at MP3 and MP4 level are in no way better than their MP2 counterparts, even for small molecules.[4]

For open shell molecules, MPn-theory can directly be applied only to unrestricted Hartree-Fock reference functions (since RHF states are not in general eigenvectors of the Fock operator). However, the resulting energies often suffer from severe spin contamination, leading to very wrong results. A much better alternative is to use one of the MP2-like methods based on restricted Hartree-Fock references.

These methods, Hartree-Fock, unrestricted Hartree-Fock and restricted Hartree-Fock use a single Slater determinant wave function. Multi-configurational self-consistent field methods use several determinants and can be used for the unperturbed operator, although not in a unique way so many methods, such as Complete Active Space Perturbation Theory (CASPT2) have been developed.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Møller C., Plesset M.S. (1934). "Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems". Phys. Rev. 46: 618–622.
  2. See all volumes in the "Further reading" section.
  3. Leininger M.L., Allen W.D., Schaefer H.F., Sherrill C.D. (2000). "Is Moller-Plesset perturbation theory a convergent ab initio method?". J. Chem. Phys. 112 (21): 9213-9222.
  4. Helgaker, Trygve; Poul Jorgensen and Jeppe Olsen (2000). Molecular Electronic Structure Theory. Wiley. ISBN 978-0471967552. 

Further reading

  • Cramer, Christopher J. (2002). Essentials of Computational Chemistry. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 207 - 211. ISBN 0-471-48552-7. 
  • Foresman, James B.; Æleen Frisch (1996). Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods. Pittsburgh, PA: Gaussian Inc., 267 - 271. ISBN 0-9636769-4-6. 
  • Leach, Andrew R. (1996). Molecular Modelling. Harlow: Longman, 83 - 85. ISBN 0-582-23933-8. 
  • Levine, Ira N. (1991). Quantum Chemistry. Englewood Cliffs, New jersey: Prentice Hall, 511 - 515. ISBN 0-205-12770-3. 
  • Szabo, Attila; Neil S. Ostlund (1996). Modern Quantum Chemistry. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc, 350 - 353. ISBN 0-486-69186-1.