Coulomb's law (magnetic)

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and not meant to be cited; by editing it you can help to improve it towards a future approved, citable version. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.
(CC) Image: PaulWormer

In physics, the magnetic Coulomb law is the magnetic equivalent of the electric Coulomb law. An important difference is that—at the present state of knowledge—"magnetic charges" (magnetic monopoles) do not exist in nature, whereas electric charges do exist. However, with the aid of a long bar magnet the force between the poles can be measured reasonably accurately.

The Coulomb force is inversely proportional to the squared distance between the magnetic poles Q1 and Q2, repulsive between like poles (N–N, S–S) and attractive between unlike poles (N–S).

Another difference with the electric Coulomb law is that in SI units there are two common measures of "amount of magnetism", i.e., the magnitudes of Q1 and Q2. This is due to the fact that there are two, closely related, vector fields giving the magnetic force. There is the magnetic field H and the magnetic induction B, which are related (in vacuum and in SI units) through

where μ0 is the magnetic constant. The force between the poles of the magnets shown in the figure is the same, irrespective of the system of units used to express the North poles. We formulate the Coulomb force in two ways,

If Q2 and Q'2 are infinitesimally small test "magnetic charges", which we divide out, we have the respective magnetic fields

The unit of B is weber/m2 and hence the magnetic pole Q'1 is measured in weber. The unit of H is ampere⋅turn/m and hence the dimension of Q1 is ampere⋅turn⋅m.

In summary, there are two consistent SI formulations of Coulomb's law for magnetic poles, see Eq. (1). The magnetic poles in the two formulations differ by the magnetic constant μ0 and have different dimensions.