9-11 Attack

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and not meant to be cited; by editing it you can help to improve it towards a future approved, citable version. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.
Due to technical limitations, this article uses an unusual title. It should be called  9/11 Attack.
(PD) Photo: Office of Emergency Management
The twin towers of the World Trade Center under attack.

The September 11, 2001, attacks were simultaneous terrorist attacks upon the United States of America on the morning of September 11, 2001. Nineteen members of the al-Qaeda terrorist network hijacked four commercial airliners, crashing two into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City and one into the Pentagon in Virginia. The fourth plane crashed in rural Pennsylvania; its target may have been the U.S. Capitol or the White House. It was the worst terrorist attack in the history of the United States,[1] and indeed incurred more casualties than at the surprise attack at the Battle of Pearl Harbor.

The American response was near-unanimous support for President George W. Bush's eventual angry declaration that this was an act of war. Al-Qaeda was quickly identified as behind the attacks, with key figures located in Afghanistan. Congress quickly passed an Authorization for the Use of Military Force, which had the legal effect of a declaration of war.

The plot

See also: al-Qaeda
See also: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

The leaders of the plot, which they called the "Planes Operation", were members of al-Qaeda, as part of its broad strategy against what it considers oppression of Muslims, by its standards. Fred Halliday, a critic of what he considers continued Cold War thinking, also cautions that this was not a purely religious act. [2]

The plot was devised by a veteran jihadist named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), from a religious family in Kuwait, who had studied in the United States, which he hated violently. It approved his scheme in 1999, and supplied guidance, collaborators, training, safe houses, and about $500,000 to finance the operation.

All of the plotters had to speak the same language so Arabs were chosen from Saudi Arabia or Yemen; some were recruited in Germany, where they had become accustomed to Western customs. Mohammed Atta, who was a student in Hamburg, was the leader of the attack force; he piloted the hijacked airliner that was first to strike a building. Ramzi Binalshibh, who had been denied access to the U.S., became KSM's chief assistant outside the U.S.

The plan was to attack the World Trade Center as the symbol of capitalism, the Pentagon as the symbol of American power, and the Capitol or White House as the source of American policy supporting Israel.

Infiltrating the hijackers

The key hijackers entered the United States legally in 2000. Two of the 19 and possibly 11 others presented fraudulently altered passports when they entered the United States. Mohammed al-Qahtani, who was refused admittance by U.S. immigration officials in August 2001, was identified by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as the probably 20th hijacker, although some reports suggest he was intended for a follow-up attack.

U.S. intelligence appears to accept that al-Qahtani, captured in Pakistan, and an admitted al-Qaeda member, knew he was going into the U.S. for a suicide attack, but did not have specific prior knowledge of the exact attack.

The attack

The four hijackings were timed to be simultaneous. "Muscle men" overpowered and killed stewards and pilots with box cutters smuggled past airport security, while the new pilots turned off the transponders needed for air traffic control, and flew the planes, each loaded with over 20,000 gallons of fuel, toward the targets.

The North American air defense system, North American Air Defense Command (NORAD), did have a few fighter aircraft available, but no one had planned for airliners turned into weapons. The fighters were positioned for threats coming from outside the borders of North America. Domestic radar suitable for controlling fighters overland had long been shut down when Soviet bombers were no longer a significant threat; air traffic control uses transponders, not radar reflections. There was no simple way to find the airliners. With the transponder turned off, it would be necessary literally to read the number painted on the aircraft.

New York

For more information, see: 9-11 Attack in New York.

On most days 50,000 people worked at the World Trade Center and another 40,000 had appointments there. The two planes struck at 8:46 am and 9:03 am when the North and South Tower buildings, 110 stories tall, were only half full. The towers survived the impact of the huge aircraft, but the burning fuel weakened the steel support systems, and both collapsed straight down, leaving a gigantic hole in lower Manhattan.

Other buildings in and around the complex were damaged, some beyond repair. The 47-story Building 7 was abandoned and collapsed. Its failure had wide-ranging effects, as it contained the main Emergency Operations Center for the city of New York. Even without the loss of the EOC, there were significant problems of coordination between emergency service organizations, especially the Fire Department of New York and the New York Police Department.

There were effects throughout New York. The immense dust cloud had long-term health effects, but, in the short term, quickly clogged the air filters of emergency electrical power generators at critical facilities elsewhere. Those facilities, such as Internet Service Providers, had a week or more fuel for their diesel generators, but had not stocked spare air filters, which were delivered on an emergency basis.

Many electrical, telecommunications and transportation facilities ran under the complex and were put out of action. A number of financial institutions had their real-time data centers in the buildings, although they quickly switched to backup.

The total number killed by the four plane crashes was 2900. From across the country fire and police departments sent rescue units as a symbolic gesture to honor the 343 firefighters and 60 police killed after they helped 25,000 people escape.

Washington

(PD) Photo: Michael W. Pendergrass / U.S. Navy
A section of the Pentagon after the attack. The attack on the Pentagon killed 64 passengers on board American Airlines Flight 77 and 125 people on the ground.
For more information, see: 9-11 Attack on the Pentagon Building.

When Flight 77 struck the Pentagon, it hit a just-remodeled section that both had been physically reinforced, and also was not fully occupied. The fact of the large number of emergency-trained military personnel may have contributed to a more rapid immediate response than in New York, where the victims largely waited for guidance from emergency service professionals.

In Arlington, Virginia, the Pentagon Building was still a disaster, but not on the scale of the World Trade Center. Most important, of course, was that the building did not collapse. Many military personnel in the building immediately responded, while people in the damaged areas were, in some cases, able to rescue themselves. The Arlington, Virginia Fire Department took Incident Command, with the Federal Bureau of Investigation coordinating the overall interagency and law enforcement response.

Flight 93

The fourth plane had a delayed takeoff and passengers on board learned by cell phone what had happened to the other three planes. They organized themselves spontaneously and rushed the hijackers, who deliberately crashed the plane before reaching Washington. For years afterwards the nation searched for overlooked clues.

Immediate Response

In the first minutes and hours, there were both operational and policy/political responses.

Operational

The Federal Aviation Administration, operating the national air traffic control system, was the first Federal agency to become aware of a possible hijacking, although it was simply aware that aircraft were not responding properly. FAA personnel at the Boston center tried to contact the North American Air Defense Command at 8:27 and gained first informal contact at 8:34; this was faster than the official procedure, which called for military contact to come from FAA Washington headquarters. Information flow started at 8:37.

First warnings

FAA personnel initially became aware of a problem with Flight 11 approximately 8:22 AM; analysis suggests the hijacking started at approximately 8:14. FAA Air Traffic Control asked another aircraft to look for Flight 11 at 8:37.[5]

Between 9:03 and 9:08, the military received some information from FAA, outside routine channels, and were beginning to plan a response.[6]The first specific communications were between the FAA Boston Center and the NORAD Northeast Air Defense Sector at Rome Air Force Base in upstate New York,[7] beginning at 08:37:52:

  • FAA BOSTON CENTER: Hi. Boston Center T.M.U. [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.
  • SGT JEREMY POWELL (NORAD): Is this real-world or exercise?
  • BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.

Command and control

President George W. Bush was traveling at the time of the attack; Vice President Dick Cheney made immediate operational decisions, from the semi-hardened White House bunker, until Bush was at a remote command post. This is standard Continuity of Government procedure, at least the President or Vice President must go to a secure location.

At the White House, the Counterterrorism Security Group, chaired by Richard Clarke, coordinated the staff response.

As information was being gathered, all civil aircraft in the United States were ordered to land at the nearest airport, under an established but never-used emergency procedure, "Security Control of Air Traffic and Air Navigation Aids", SCATANA.[8] As planned, the FAA would actuate SCATANA in response to NORAD orders.

Policy and political

David Frum, then a speechwriter for George W. Bush, called Richard Perle within minutes of the 9-11 Attacks. Frum had been, along with the rest of the staff, evacuated from the White House and was using Perle's office at the American Enterprise Institute. Perle said he cannot remember all the conversation, but he said that Frum said that President Bush should say "he will not distinguish between the individual terrorists and the countries that support them. I didn't identify the attack with a specific group since there are multiple groups that cheerfully could have done this. But I had felt for a long time that chasing individual terrorists was a losing proposition. Terrorists could hide, but the countries that accommodated them couldn't." [9]

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was to many a hero to the city and the nation for his response in organizing rescue, relief and healing operations, making him "Person of the Year" for Time magazine and propelling him to a presidential run in 2008. Psychologically, the nation joined together in a unity that had not been seen since the end of World War Two. Long-standing hostility and ridicule of New York City burned away; there was no opposition to Congressional votes of $20 billion in aid to the city. Over a billion dollars poured in as voluntary contributions to help the families of the victims. Despite economic losses that approached $100 billion, the emergency repairs were quickly made and the economy of the metropolis never faltered.

However the national aviation and tourism industries suffered heavily as people were afraid of future hijackings. The overall economy had already slipped into a downturn and 9-11 made the recession worse. Giuliani ran for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008 primarily on the basis of his performance in the crisis.

World response

The immediate threat was in Afghanistan, and within weeks NATO forces, led by American and British troops, invaded. This was the first invocation of Article 5, the mutual self-defense obligation of the NATO charter.

Lutjens on 9/11

Responses came at all levels. The German destroyer Lutjens, named for the admiral who commanded the DKM Bismarck on its final voyage against Britain, had been doing exercises, in the UK, with the US Burke-class destroyer USS Churchill (DDG-81). As Churchill got underway for emergency response, the Lutjens crew manned the rails, a naval custom showing respect. The white banner, held by the sailors on the upper deck, reads "we stand with you."

In the case of Germany, the invocation of Article 5 led to the first authorization of German troops for UN-sponsored but non-NATO operations. [10]

Homefront impact

McCartney, (2004) argues that America's strong sense of exceptionalism shaped US foreign policy following the 9-11 attacks. Utilizing the perception of the American people that the nation was destined by God to bring a new order to the world, President Bush portrayed America as the guardian of freedom and values all people cherish. Bush also identified as evil the terrorists and all those who opposed America's efforts to liberate oppressed people everywhere, and he justified the use of unilateral preemptive attacks on other countries, namely, Iraq, as necessary to ensure that the United States was able to fulfill its divine mission.

Emergency legislation

In terms of domestic policy the most important result of 9-11 was the passage in October 2001, by bipartisan majorities, of a law formally titled "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001" (USA PATRIOT Act). The Patriot Act significantly enhanced the ability of law enforcement agencies to trace terrorist cells, especially those using the phone system or the Internet, to share information among many different security agencies, and to seize the financial assets used by terrorists. Civil libertarians worried that the PATRIOT act sacrificed some rights in the name of security.

Despite some fears that Americans would take out their frustration against Muslims inside this country, nothing of the sort happened. Law enforcement did increase their surveillance of foreigners from the Middle East, leading to debates about the wisdom of ethnic profiling.

Government reorganization

For more information, see: U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

The second most important domestic result was the reorganization of multiple federal agencies dealing with terrorism. 22 different agencies with 180,000 employees merged into the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the largest reorganization of the federal government in 50 years. The new department included the Secret Service, Border Patrol and Customs Service of the U.S. Department of the Treasury; Immigration and Naturalization Service of the U.S. Department of Justice; the independent Federal Emergency Management Agency; and the United States Coast Guard and Transportation Security Administration from the U.S. Department of Transportation.

There had been, for some time, a National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) primarily with CIA staff but with FBI representation. Unusual for the time, the CIA personnel came both from the Directorate of Operations and the Directorate of Intelligence. The NCTC stayed separate from DHS.

Memorials

(PD) Photo: Denise Gould / U.S. Air Force
The "Tribute in Light" memorial, consisting of two towers of light that are composed of two banks of high wattage spotlights that point straight up from a lot next to Ground Zero.

Ground Zero became an informal shrine, as New York's leaders debated how to handle the memorials and the rebuilding. Mayor Rudy Giuliani gained enormous prestige from his sensitive handling of the crisis, propelling him to a leading position in 2007 for the Republican presidential nomination in 2007.

Conspiracy theories

See also: September 11 conspiracy theories, Conspiracy theory

Some have alleged that the facts of the attack described by the government and by mainstream society are wrong: these are considered by most to be conspiracy theories. They broadly fall into two camps: theories that the U.S. government let the attacks happen on purpose (the so-called LIHOP theories) and theories that the U.S. government made the attacks happen through some kind of controlled demolition or false flag operation (the so-called MIHOP theories). Given the direct video evidence of an airliner hitting one of the two WTC towers, it seems absurd that such conspiracies exist, but they draw on a variety of purported evidence including tapes from NORAD that claim to show malicious cover-up in not scrambling fighter jets quickly after reports, claims of financial motivations including

These have been advanced through traditional conspiracy theory sources: specialist Internet forums and websites, newsletters and real-world meetups, through conspiracy theory films such as Loose Change and Zeitgeist, and through a variety of fringe academics including the theologian David Ray Griffin and the "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" group. Those in this camp are often referred to as "the 9/11 truth movement", "9/11 Truthers" or simpler "Truthers".

In response to Loose Change, skeptical groups on the Internet centered around the James Randi Internet forum have produced a response film called Screw Loose Change which adds subtitles and cutaway notes to the original containing corrections and responses. These responses include allegations that the film includes quotes taken out of context, uses logical fallacies, misrepresents evidence, and makes dubious connections to events without explaining the proper historical context. Similarly, Popular Mechanics has responded in depth with evidence gleaned from experts that debunk many of the contentions made by conspiracy theorists. A number of websites and books have also appeared that attempt to refute arguments made by the 9/11 truthers.

References

  1. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9-11 Commission) (2004), The 9/11 Commission Report
  2. Fred Halliday (16 September 2001), "No man is an island: All religions have texts that can be used to justify terror, believes Fred Halliday. We have to trust, instead, in international law", The Observer, Guardian (UK)
  3. 9-11 Commission Report, p. 4
  4. 9-11 Commission Report, p. 21
  5. 9-11 Commission Report, pp. 452-454
  6. 9-11 Commission Report, pp. 23-24
  7. Michael Bronner date = August 2006, "9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes", Vanity Fair
  8. , Security Control of Air Traffic and Air Navigation Aids (SHORT TITLE: SCATANA), Title 32: National Defense, Code of Federeal Regulations
  9. Alan Weisman (2007), Prince of Darkness: Richard Perle: The Kingdom, the Power & the End of Empire in America, Union Square Press, ISBN 978402752308, pp. 163-165
  10. Peter Shearman, Matthew Sussex, ed. (2004), European security after 9/11, ISBN 0754635945, p. 71