Talk:Chiropractic/Timelines

From Citizendium
< Talk:Chiropractic
Revision as of 21:24, 13 November 2007 by Robert W King (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
 

With the advent of timelines in the CZ subpages, I moved my research notes that I used to create the chiropractic history article to this space. It needs work to be article appropriate, but it is still experimental for determining the best way to create a timeline process.

This is from wikipedia, but is all my work from a talk subpage. --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:12, 16 July 2007 (CDT)

Definitely looks better without the TOC. --Matt Innis (Talk) 08:03, 26 July 2007 (CDT)

Well, a TOC might be helpful, but not if most of the items on the list are headings! Why not make headings only for decades, and demote everything else? --Larry Sanger 09:30, 26 July 2007 (CDT)

I'll try that. They would obviously need to be demoted below a header level so they don;t chow up in the TOC. --Matt Innis (Talk) 10:00, 26 July 2007 (CDT)


Check out the new/old button on the subpages tempalte. Imagine in an approved version that the Chiropractic > subpages are protected. How can we make changes? One possible alternative to a draft version is to use the Talk:Chiropractic > page to make improvements. It seems a better alternative than using the talk page to discuss options that can only be made by a sysop. Or are there other solutions? I know Larry has thought about this, any ideas from you Matt? Chris Day (talk) 17:13, 27 July 2007 (CDT)

I must have missed something, "new/old" button? Where is the best place to go to catch up on this Chris. --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:51, 20 August 2007 (CDT)

It is now the yellow button, only shows up on approved articles and their draft pages. It allows a comparison between the draft version and the approved version. Chris Day (talk) 22:01, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
As far as catching up, the two up to date templates are {{subpages2}} (vertical) and {{subpages9}} (horizontal). A must read thread in the forums is http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1149.0.html Also need to read this page CZ:Subpages/Which_style? Chris Day (talk) 22:08, 20 August 2007 (CDT)