Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • #REDIRECT [[Receiver operating characteristic curve]]
    53 bytes (5 words) - 05:41, 8 December 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Receiver operating characteristic curve]]
    53 bytes (5 words) - 05:41, 8 December 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Receiver operating characteristic curve]]
    53 bytes (5 words) - 05:45, 8 December 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Receiver operating characteristic curve]]
    53 bytes (5 words) - 05:46, 8 December 2008
  • In [[statistics]] and [[diagnostic test]]s, the '''receiver operating characteristic curve''', also called '''ROC curve''', is a "graphic means for assessing the abil
    3 KB (407 words) - 20:27, 20 May 2010
  • Auto-populated based on [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Receiver operating characteristic curve]]. Needs checking by a human.
    497 bytes (62 words) - 19:55, 11 January 2010
  • 2 KB (309 words) - 22:03, 3 June 2011
  • {{main|Receiver operating characteristic curve}} The area under the [[receiver operating characteristic curve]] (ROC curve), AROC, or c-index has been proposed. The c-index varies from
    18 KB (2,610 words) - 05:45, 15 March 2024
  • {{Image|Journal.pmed.1000047.g006.gif|right|350px|[[Receiver operating characteristic curve|ROC curve]]s for the distinction between radicular and axial [[lumbalgia|L
    6 KB (798 words) - 02:53, 15 June 2010
  • ...ham risk tool] is limited<ref name="pmid16818927"/> except in one study ([[Receiver operating characteristic curve|AUC]] increased from 0.735 to 0.750)<ref name="pmid15023871">{{cite journal ...Framingham data showed small improvement from using the log of the CRP ([[Receiver operating characteristic curve|AUC]] increased from 0.795 to 0.799 and 12% of patients had improved estima
    18 KB (2,514 words) - 01:24, 1 June 2012
  • ...2008.01.003 }}</ref> In this study of 1,651 patients, the area under the [[receiver operating characteristic curve]] (AUC) for predicting death was 0.83 for the [[pneumonia severity index]] ...36.00054507 }}</ref> In this study of 1,671 patients, the area under the [[receiver operating characteristic curve]] (AUC) for predicting death was 0.79 for the [[CURB-65]] alone and signifi
    21 KB (2,985 words) - 18:51, 17 February 2015
  • ...BISAP may not be as accurate as Ranson's and have a lower area under the [[receiver operating characteristic curve]].<ref name="pmid19861954">{{cite journal| author=Papachristou GI, Muddana
    14 KB (1,864 words) - 10:49, 23 February 2012
  • | Area under the [[receiver operating characteristic curve]] (AROC)<ref name="pmid7063747">{{cite journal| author=Hanley JA, McNeil BJ
    36 KB (5,130 words) - 20:23, 15 August 2012
  • ...rve]] (SROC curve) should be replaced by either the hierarchical summary [[receiver operating characteristic curve]](HSROC curve).<ref name="pmid19075208">{{cite journal| author=Leeflang MM,
    73 KB (9,970 words) - 13:21, 2 February 2023
  • 41 KB (5,532 words) - 23:14, 6 October 2013
  • ## 11-point precision recall graph is similar to a [[receiver operating characteristic curve]]<ref name="pmid15561789">{{cite journal |author=Aphinyanaphongs Y, Tsamard
    47 KB (6,522 words) - 15:13, 27 December 2013
  • ...r-item clinical prediction rule is available with similar area under the [[receiver operating characteristic curve]]:<ref name="pmid18482294">{{cite journal| author=Huynh BC, Rovner A, Rich
    73 KB (10,150 words) - 21:46, 20 August 2014