Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free.
Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. --

Difference between revisions of "Revolt of the Admirals"

From Citizendium
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{subpages}}
 
{{subpages}}
Taking place primarily between 1948 and 1949, but affecting United States [[strategic bombardment]] policy for years afterwards, the '''Revolt of the Admirals''' initially appeared to be a funding argument between the [[B-36]] bomber and the Navy's proposed "supercarriers". It actually addressed a broader question of service roles and missions,  <ref>{{citation
+
Taking place primarily between 1948 and 1949, but affecting United States [[strategic bombing]] policy for years afterwards, the '''Revolt of the Admirals''' initially appeared to be a funding argument between the [[B-36]] bomber and the Navy's proposed "supercarriers". It actually addressed a broader question of service roles and missions,  <ref>{{citation
 
  | url = http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/acsc/98-166.pdf
 
  | url = http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/acsc/98-166.pdf
 
  | author =  Andrew L. Lewis | publisher = Air Command and Staff College, U.S. Air Force
 
  | author =  Andrew L. Lewis | publisher = Air Command and Staff College, U.S. Air Force

Latest revision as of 01:28, 16 September 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Taking place primarily between 1948 and 1949, but affecting United States strategic bombing policy for years afterwards, the Revolt of the Admirals initially appeared to be a funding argument between the B-36 bomber and the Navy's proposed "supercarriers". It actually addressed a broader question of service roles and missions, [1] beyond the Key West Agreement. It is generally seen as having been won by the Air Force, sending a number of admirals into retirement.

The Air Force retained nuclear primacy certainly before the first Single Integrated Operational Plan studies at the end of the Eisenhower and beginning of the Kennedy Administrations, and arguably until the creation of United States Strategic Command to replace the Strategic Air Command.

References

  1. Andrew L. Lewis, Revolt of the Admirals, Air Command and Staff College, U.S. Air Force, p. v