Talk:Pseudoscience: Revision history

20 February 2024

• curprev 05:4805:48, 20 February 2024‎ John Leach talk contribs‎ m 114,441 bytes −1‎ Text replacement - "brain anatomy" to "neuroanatomy"

10 October 2013

• curprev 16:4116:41, 10 October 2013‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ 114,442 bytes +114,442‎ →‎Cargo cult
• curprev 09:1909:19, 10 October 2013‎ imported>John Stephenson‎ 114,366 bytes +250‎ something like that
• curprev 09:1609:16, 10 October 2013‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 114,116 bytes −166‎ rm duplicate
• curprev 07:4707:47, 10 October 2013‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ 114,282 bytes +166‎ →‎Cargo cult: new section
• curprev 07:4307:43, 10 October 2013‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ 114,116 bytes +166‎ →‎Cargo cult: new section

22 January 2011

• curprev 14:5214:52, 22 January 2011‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 113,950 bytes +1,290‎ →‎Columbus
• curprev 07:2607:26, 22 January 2011‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 113,320 bytes +239‎ →‎Columbus
• curprev 06:4806:48, 22 January 2011‎ imported>Peter Jackson‎ 113,081 bytes +421‎ →‎Columbus: new section

30 November 2010

• curprev 08:3808:38, 30 November 2010‎ imported>Daniel Mietchen‎ m 112,660 bytes +238‎ →‎Advice anyone?
• curprev 07:2707:27, 30 November 2010‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 112,422 bytes +26,112‎ →‎Advice anyone?

26 November 2010

• curprev 12:4912:49, 26 November 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 112,220 bytes +757‎ →‎Advice anyone?
• curprev 10:5510:55, 26 November 2010‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 111,463 bytes +25,153‎ →‎Advice anyone?: my two cents
• curprev 05:0305:03, 26 November 2010‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 111,288 bytes +5,419‎ →‎Advice anyone?
• curprev 04:4904:49, 26 November 2010‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 109,541 bytes +3,672‎ →‎Prescience versus pseudoscience

2 November 2010

• curprev 14:3814:38, 2 November 2010‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 108,209 bytes +2,340‎ →‎Prescience versus pseudoscience
• curprev 14:0714:07, 2 November 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 106,567 bytes +698‎ →‎Prescience versus pseudoscience
• curprev 11:5211:52, 2 November 2010‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 106,286 bytes +417‎ →‎Prescience versus pseudoscience
• curprev 11:3711:37, 2 November 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 105,869 bytes +19,559‎ →‎Alternative, complementary and integrative medicine
• curprev 11:3011:30, 2 November 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ m 105,042 bytes +51‎ →‎Prescience versus pseudoscience
• curprev 11:2811:28, 2 November 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 104,991 bytes +940‎ →‎Prescience versus pseudoscience: new section
• curprev 08:5908:59, 2 November 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 104,051 bytes +17,741‎ No edit summary

25 August 2010

• curprev 10:5410:54, 25 August 2010‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 102,325 bytes +1,701‎ →‎Alternative, complementary and integrative medicine
• curprev 03:3203:32, 25 August 2010‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 100,624 bytes +580‎ →‎Alternative, complementary and integrative medicine

24 August 2010

• curprev 11:4211:42, 24 August 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 100,044 bytes +13,734‎ →‎Alternative, complementary and integrative medicine
• curprev 11:2311:23, 24 August 2010‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 98,396 bytes +4,874‎ No edit summary
• curprev 08:1008:10, 24 August 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 93,522 bytes +7,212‎ →‎Alternative, complementary and integrative medicine: new section

6 April 2010

• curprev 15:5115:51, 6 April 2010‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 91,711 bytes +3,023‎ No monopoly for atheists
• curprev 15:3215:32, 6 April 2010‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 91,014 bytes +2,326‎ →‎Not sure about the brights reference: Atheists rebranded, right?
• curprev 14:4414:44, 6 April 2010‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 88,688 bytes +2,378‎ pseudoscience, scientific method, and neutrality

23 March 2010

• curprev 21:1821:18, 23 March 2010‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 86,504 bytes +194‎ →‎the supreme crackpot of all time: new section

4 February 2009

• curprev 10:4410:44, 4 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ m 86,310 bytes +11,218‎ →‎Sloppy, poorly defined
• curprev 10:2410:24, 4 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 86,309 bytes +2,958‎ →‎the WP lede sentence is actually pretty good: PLEASE follow the indenting RULES, everyone! It really gets confusing if you don't!
• curprev 10:1110:11, 4 February 2009‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 86,298 bytes +2,947‎ →‎the WP lede sentence is actually pretty good
• curprev 10:0610:06, 4 February 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 86,200 bytes +1,306‎ →‎the WP lede sentence is actually pretty good
• curprev 10:0210:02, 4 February 2009‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 84,894 bytes +1,543‎ →‎the WP lede sentence is actually pretty good
• curprev 09:3409:34, 4 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 83,636 bytes +285‎ No edit summary
• curprev 09:2409:24, 4 February 2009‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 83,351 bytes +1,165‎ We still need a good definition

3 February 2009

• curprev 22:3222:32, 3 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 82,186 bytes +1,973‎ →‎the WP lede sentence is actually pretty good: new section
• curprev 22:2022:20, 3 February 2009‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 81,765 bytes +1,552‎ not even close to a good article

15 January 2009

• curprev 13:0713:07, 15 January 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 80,213 bytes +5,121‎ →‎Tectonics
• curprev 11:2911:29, 15 January 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 79,949 bytes +4,857‎ →‎Chiropractic as a model of new concepts explaining efficacy

2 July 2008

• curprev 12:4712:47, 2 July 2008‎ imported>Richard Jensen‎ 78,710 bytes +464‎ plate tectonics
• curprev 01:4501:45, 2 July 2008‎ imported>Richard Jensen‎ 78,246 bytes +304‎ revise lede

23 April 2008

• curprev 19:1719:17, 23 April 2008‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ m 77,942 bytes +1,269‎ No edit summary

30 November 2007

• curprev 12:4012:40, 30 November 2007‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 76,673 bytes +1,875‎ →‎Bad science vs Pseudoscience: should be removed or rewritten
• curprev 10:4610:46, 30 November 2007‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 76,051 bytes +8‎ →‎Bad science vs Pseudoscience: Wouldn't any sensible commentary just explain that it was not pseudoscience?
• curprev 10:4410:44, 30 November 2007‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 76,043 bytes +248‎ →‎Bad vs Pseudoscience
• curprev 07:5307:53, 30 November 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 75,795 bytes +650‎ →‎QM ever seen as pseudoscience?
• curprev 06:0206:02, 30 November 2007‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 75,683 bytes +538‎ →‎QM ever seen as pseudoscience?: new section