Talk:Amateur Computer Group of New Jersey: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
The question is whether it is feasible that we might maintain not only this article but articles on every computer user group of this size in existence.  Furthermore, if we keep this article, the name needs to be changed. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:42, 14 February 2007 (CST)
The question is whether it is feasible that we might maintain not only this article but articles on every computer user group of this size in existence.  Furthermore, if we keep this article, the name needs to be changed. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:42, 14 February 2007 (CST)


[[Category:Articles for deletion]]
Actually I think this is ok, when placed under the group: computer groups/User groups
Actually I think this is ok, when placed under the group: computer groups/User groups


[[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 12:40, 14 February 2007 (CST)
[[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 12:40, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 02:17, 2 February 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Computers [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English
To do.


Metadata here


The question is whether it is feasible that we might maintain not only this article but articles on every computer user group of this size in existence. Furthermore, if we keep this article, the name needs to be changed. --Larry Sanger 09:42, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Actually I think this is ok, when placed under the group: computer groups/User groups

Robert Tito | Talk 12:40, 14 February 2007 (CST)