Open Shortest Path First for IPv6: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
  | author = R. Coltun, D. Ferguson, J. Moy, A. Lindem
  | author = R. Coltun, D. Ferguson, J. Moy, A. Lindem
  | date=July 2008
  | date=July 2008
| url = http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5340.txt}}</ref?> which can handle both [[Internet Protocol version 4]] and [[Internet Protocol version 6]]. Familiarity with basic [[Open Shortest Path First]] (OSPF) and [[link state routing]] terminology is assumed in this article.  
| url = http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5340.txt}}</ref> which can handle both [[Internet Protocol version 4]] and [[Internet Protocol version 6]]. Familiarity with basic [[Open Shortest Path First]] (OSPF) and [[link state routing]] terminology is assumed in this article.  


In some respects, readers will find that OSPF packets are simpler, in that this protocol allows IPv6 headers to do a number of things that previous OSPF did itself, occasionally duplicating IPv4 functionality. The packet headers do not contain source and destination addresses. Another simplification of the header is that OSPF-specific authentication has been removed, since the [[Authentication Header]] and [[Encapsulating Security Payload]] headers of IPv6 provide a quite adequate authentication function.
In some respects, readers will find that OSPF packets are simpler, in that this protocol allows IPv6 headers to do a number of things that previous OSPF did itself, occasionally duplicating IPv4 functionality. The packet headers do not contain source and destination addresses. Another simplification of the header is that OSPF-specific authentication has been removed, since the [[Authentication Header]] and [[Encapsulating Security Payload]] headers of IPv6 provide a quite adequate authentication function.
Line 152: Line 152:
New LSAs are more general. While they now can carry IPv4 or IPv6 information, there is no reason they cannot handle additional types of addresses.
New LSAs are more general. While they now can carry IPv4 or IPv6 information, there is no reason they cannot handle additional types of addresses.
===LSA header===
===LSA header===
      0                  1                  2                  3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |          LS Age              |          LS Type            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Link State ID                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    Advertising Router                        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    LS Sequence Number                        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |        LS Checksum            |            Length            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
===LSA types===
===LSA types===
==Deployment==
==Deployment==
==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}

Revision as of 14:51, 6 September 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Open_Shortest_Path_First_for_IPv6&printable=yes
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Template:TOC-right A standard IP routing protocol, Open Shortest Path First, has been issued in a major new version,[1] which can handle both Internet Protocol version 4 and Internet Protocol version 6. Familiarity with basic Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and link state routing terminology is assumed in this article.

In some respects, readers will find that OSPF packets are simpler, in that this protocol allows IPv6 headers to do a number of things that previous OSPF did itself, occasionally duplicating IPv4 functionality. The packet headers do not contain source and destination addresses. Another simplification of the header is that OSPF-specific authentication has been removed, since the Authentication Header and Encapsulating Security Payload headers of IPv6 provide a quite adequate authentication function.

It remains true that most OSPF packets consist of a general-purpose header, and, in most packets, a variable number of Link State Advertisements. The most striking difference, however, is that the headers, and most of the LSAs, do not carry addresses, but a more compact identifier — which also gets around the problem of determining the type of address carried in an LSA. Actual addresses, IPv4 and IPv6, are only carried in Link State Updates.

Terminology changes

Due to the need to carry more than one kind of address, some of which will be quite long, terminology often has been generalized. Some data structures also have become less dependent on IPv4 conventions: where OSPFv2 encoded subnet identifications as a 32-bit address and a 32-bit subnet mask, the new version has the prefix, but uses the CIDR convention of an integer for prefix length rather than a mask. Since discontiguous masks have not been used in years, the /length notation is more readable and more general, but also more compact in storage.

Generalizing identifiers

There are many places, in all OSPF versions, where fields are 32 bits long. Simply because a field is 32 bits long, and may even be displayed in the format of an IPv4 address, does not mean that the field has to be a valid IPv4 address. Since OSPF for IPv6 continues to retain 32-bit identifiers in many places, even though all its actual addressing is IPv6, getting into the habit of thinking "identifier" rather than "address" will enormously simplify OSPF for IPv6 deployment.

Generalizing links

Some places in OSPFv2 used addresses when all that was needed by an identifier. That consumed address space, but could also lead to ambiguities. The need for address uniqueness was one reason that a single "link" could belong to only one OSPF instance.

Previous OSPF flooded information in what it called "networks", which were actually IPv4 subnets. OSPF for v6 floods on links, which may contain multiple subnets; note that from the IP standpoint, virtual local area networks (VLAN) are different links.

OSPF packets

There remain five OSPF packet types, with a header, and, in four of the five cases, a variable number of link state advertisements (LSA). This is still true, but the header and LSAs often have been both simplified and generalized.

To review relationships, Hellos are used in interface initialization, learning about the other routers on the common link, and to detect router failures. Database description are means of initializing the topology information.

Link state request, link state update, and link state acknowledgement work together as parts of the same function: efficiently propagating confirmed information about topology changes, both announcement and withdrawal of elements of the topology.

Packet header

This is much the same as in earlier versions, but simpler, with such things as addresses and authentication removed because IPv6 adequately performs their functions. 

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |   Version #   |     Type      |         Packet length         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                         Router ID                             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                          Area ID                              |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |          Checksum             |  Instance ID  |      0        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Instance ID is new; it relaxes the requirement for unique area and router identifiers and allows multiple instances of OSPF to coexist (i.e., multiple independent OSPF routing domains.

Packet type

Hello packet

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      3        |       1       |         Packet Length         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                         Router ID                             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                          Area ID                              |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |          Checksum             | Instance ID   |     0         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                        Interface ID                           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | Rtr Priority  |             Options                           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        HelloInterval          |       RouterDeadInterval      |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                   Designated Router ID                        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                Backup Designated Router ID                    |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                         Neighbor ID                           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                        ...

Database description

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |      3        |       2       |        Packet Length           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |                           Router ID                            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |                             Area ID                            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |           Checksum            |  Instance ID  |      0         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |       0       |               Options                          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |        Interface MTU          |      0        |0|0|0|0|0|I|M|MS|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |                    DD sequence number                          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |                                                                |
     +-                                                              -+
     |                                                                |
     +-                     An LSA Header                            -+
     |                                                                |
     +-                                                              -+
     |                                                                |
     +-                                                              -+
     |                                                                |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+
     |                       ...                                      |

Link state request

In the link state request/update procedure, the requesting router has learned that some of its information is outdated, and it wants to get the most recent instance of information about the topologic element. 

  Each LSA requested is specified by its LS type, Link State ID, and
  Advertising Router.  This uniquely identifies the LSA without
  specifying its instance.  Link State Request packets are understood
  to be requests for the most recent instance of the specified LSAs.

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      3        |       3       |        Packet Length          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                             Router ID                         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                             Area ID                           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |          Checksum             |  Instance ID  |      0        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |              0                |        LS Type                |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                         Link State ID                         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                       Advertising Router                      |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                 ...                           |

Link state update

This is the only type of OSPF packet that now carries complete topology informtion information, although the common information here is not address-dependent. The address-dependent information is in an LSA. 

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      3        |       4       |         Packet Length         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                         Router ID                             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                          Area ID                              |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |          Checksum             |  Instance ID  |      0        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                           # LSAs                              |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                                               |
     +-                                                            +-+
     |                            LSAs                               |
     +-                                                            +-+
     |                             ...                               |

Link state acknowledgement

Link state advertisements

New LSAs are more general. While they now can carry IPv4 or IPv6 information, there is no reason they cannot handle additional types of addresses.

LSA header

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |           LS Age              |           LS Type             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                       Link State ID                           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                    Advertising Router                         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                    LS Sequence Number                         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        LS Checksum            |             Length            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

LSA types

Deployment

References

  1. ↑ R. Coltun, D. Ferguson, J. Moy, A. Lindem (July 2008), OSPF for IPv6, RFC5340
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Open_Shortest_Path_First_for_IPv6&oldid=527655"