NOTICE: Citizendium is still being set up on its newer server, treat as a beta for now; please see here for more.
Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free. Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. --

Difference between revisions of "Talk:First Crusade"

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:The First Crusade moved to Talk:First Crusade: Correct title)
m (Talk:First Crusade moved to Talk:The First Crusade over redirect: revert)
(No difference)

Revision as of 17:35, 16 March 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist. To update this checklist edit the metadata template.
 Definition Crusade from 1096 to 1099, which captured Jerusalem and created a theocracy there. [d] [e]

For this article I am using a variety of sources, but in particular John France, Stephen Runciman and Jonathon Riley Smith. As the three great 'men' of Crusading historiography I thought this might lead to a balanced account. The article will be broken up from the Princes Crusade like this: 1) Europe to Constantinople, 2) Nicea, 3) Dorylaeum, 4) Siege of Antioch, 5) Road to Jerusalem, 6) Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. Of course, anyone else is more than welcome to join in. Denis Cavanagh 11:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Looks good, the only thing I can think of is that this probably needs to be moved to First Crusade and drop the The. --Todd Coles 16:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Todd, what do you think of the way I've split it up amongst the major Princes - too bulky? I thought the way I had it before was less reader friendly. Denis Cavanagh 17:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)