Why does this exist as a separate page? As I see it, the Angel article covers the ground; parts of this might be moved there, then this deleted. We do not need a detailed account based on one interpretation of the Bible.
The Bible citations are problematic. There are far too many to be reasonable as footnotes. Is there not some convention that allows citations like [Job 13:2] or whatever?
The "further reading" section has two problems. One is that CZ does not use such sections; there are subpages for such things, in this case Angel_(Biblical)/Bibliography and Angel_(Biblical)/External_Links. The other is that the links seem inappropriate; they are to sites which seem to have an obvious fundamentalist agenda. Far better to use scholarly sites, or even links to major churches. Sandy Harris 07:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)