NOTICE: Citizendium is still being set up on its newer server, treat as a beta for now; please see here for more. |

Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free. Click here to join and contribute—free |

CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. -- |

# Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abelian group"

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium

(New page: {{subpages}}) |
(→Suggested change in notation for abelian map groups: new section) |
||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||

+ | |||

+ | == Suggested change in notation for abelian map groups == | ||

+ | |||

+ | The notation <math>\scriptstyle f\circ g = g \circ f</math> is impossible to understand unless you are familiar with maps, which is not very likely if you want to know what abelian groups are. | ||

+ | |||

+ | Why not make this idea more accessible to everyone by changing it to f(g(x))=g(f(x)) for all x in the domain of the functions? | ||

+ | |||

+ | I don't want to make this edit myself, as I'm not very familiar with CZ policies yet. [[User:David Spector|David Spector]] 03:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC) |

## Revision as of 03:42, 18 April 2010

## Suggested change in notation for abelian map groups

The notation is impossible to understand unless you are familiar with maps, which is not very likely if you want to know what abelian groups are.

Why not make this idea more accessible to everyone by changing it to f(g(x))=g(f(x)) for all x in the domain of the functions?

I don't want to make this edit myself, as I'm not very familiar with CZ policies yet. David Spector 03:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)