NOTICE: Citizendium is still being set up on its newer server, treat as a beta for now; please see here for more.
Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free. Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. --

Difference between revisions of "Roe v. Wade"

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search
(copyedits; updated now that the 2008 election is over)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{subpages}}
 
{{subpages}}
 
+
{{Image|Blackmun.jpg|right|2410px|Harry Blackmun, the author of Roe v. Wade}}
 
'''''Roe v. Wade''''', 441 US 113 (1973), is a [[United States]] [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] decision that overturned most state laws outlawing [[abortion]], as it found them to be in violation of the constitutional right to privacy that the Court found in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice [[Harry Blackmun]], a [[Richard Nixon]] apointee, was the author of the majority opinion, with multiple concurrences written by other justices. [[Byron White]] and [[William Rehnquist]] dissented from the decision and wrote separate opinions.
 
'''''Roe v. Wade''''', 441 US 113 (1973), is a [[United States]] [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] decision that overturned most state laws outlawing [[abortion]], as it found them to be in violation of the constitutional right to privacy that the Court found in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice [[Harry Blackmun]], a [[Richard Nixon]] apointee, was the author of the majority opinion, with multiple concurrences written by other justices. [[Byron White]] and [[William Rehnquist]] dissented from the decision and wrote separate opinions.
  

Revision as of 19:36, 24 October 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and not meant to be cited; by editing it you can help to improve it towards a future approved, citable version. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.
(PD) Photo: Supreme Court of the United States
Harry Blackmun, the author of Roe v. Wade

Roe v. Wade, 441 US 113 (1973), is a United States Supreme Court decision that overturned most state laws outlawing abortion, as it found them to be in violation of the constitutional right to privacy that the Court found in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Harry Blackmun, a Richard Nixon apointee, was the author of the majority opinion, with multiple concurrences written by other justices. Byron White and William Rehnquist dissented from the decision and wrote separate opinions.

The plaintiff, whose privacy was masked as 'Jane Roe,' was Norma L. McCorvey, a pregnant Texan woman who claimed to have become pregnant as the result of rape. There were co-plaintiffs too: a "childless married couple (the Does), the wife not being pregnant, separately attacked the laws, basing alleged injury on the future possibilities of contraceptive failure, pregnancy, unpreparedness for parenthood, and impairment of the wife's health"[1]. The defendant, Henry Wade, was the District Attorney of Dallas County and represented the State of Texas. McCorvey is now a pro-life activist.

The practical consequences of the plaintiff's victory mean that abortion in the United States is legal until the point at which a fetus becomes viable - set in the court at a maximum of twenty-eight weeks.

Abortion-related cases that have reached the Supreme Court since Roe include Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989), Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), Stenberg v. Carhart (2000) and Gonzales v. Carhart (2003). The nominations to the Supreme Court in the current presidential term are widely considered to be the deciding factor on whether or not Roe will continue to be law into the future or not.

References

  1. Mr Justice Blackmun's majority opinion