NOTICE: Citizendium is still being set up on its newer server, treat as a beta for now; please see here for more.
Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free. Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. --

Difference between revisions of "Neuroeconomics/Bibliography"

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{subpages}} *Proceedings of the 2nd conference on neuroeconomics. May 25-27, 2004. Munster, germany. (2005). Brain Res Bull, 67(5), 341-442. *Barraclough, D. J., Conroy, M. L., & Lee, D....)
(No difference)

Revision as of 10:12, 13 January 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A list of key readings about Neuroeconomics.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
  • Proceedings of the 2nd conference on neuroeconomics. May 25-27, 2004. Munster, germany. (2005). Brain Res Bull, 67(5), 341-442.
  • Barraclough, D. J., Conroy, M. L., & Lee, D. (2004). Prefrontal cortex and decision making in a mixed-strategy game. Nat Neurosci, 7(4), 410.
  • Baumgartner, T., Lutz, K., Schmidt, C. F., & Jancke, L. (2006). The emotional power of music: How music enhances the feeling of affective pictures. Brain Res, 1075(1), 151-164.
  • Baumgartner, T., Valko, L., Esslen, M., & Jancke, L. (2006). Neural correlate of spatial presence in an arousing and noninteractive virtual reality: An eeg and psychophysiology study. Cyberpsychol Behav, 9(1), 30-45.
  • Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, In Press, Corrected Proof.
  • Benhabib, J., & Bisin, A. (2005). Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions. Games and Economic Behavior, In Press, Corrected Proof.
  • Braeutigam, S. (2005). Neuroeconomics--from neural systems to economic behaviour. Brain Res Bull, 67(5), 355-360.
  • Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2004). Neuroeconomics: Why economics needs brains. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 555-579.
  • Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K., Nagode, J., Rustichini, A., Smith, K., & Pardo, J. (2003). From the cover: The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(6), 3536.
  • Dorris, M. C., & Glimcher, P. W. (2004). Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the relative subjective desirability of action. Neuron, 44(2), 378.
  • Glimcher, P. W. (2003). Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain : The science of neuroeconomics. Cambridge, Mass. ; London: MIT Press.
  • Glimcher, P. W., Dorris, M. C., & Bayer, H. M. (2005). Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. Games Econ Behav, 52(2), 213-256.
  • Glimcher, P. W., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science, 306(5695), 447-452.
  • Gutnik, L. A., Hakimzada, A. F., Yoskowitz, N. A., & Patel, V. L. (2006). The role of emotion in decision-making: A cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behavior. J Biomed Inform.
  • Hakimzada, F. A., Gutnik, L. A., Yoskowitz, N. A., & Patel, V. L. (2005). Cognitive neuroeconomics: New solutions to old problems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 974.
  • Inukai, K., & Takahashi, T. (2006). Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames. Med Hypotheses, 67(2), 283-286.
  • Kenning, P., & Plassmann, H. (2005). Neuroeconomics: An overview from an economic perspective. Brain Res Bull, 67(5), 343-354.
  • Kording, K. P., Fukunaga, I., Howard, I. S., Ingram, J. N., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). A neuroeconomics approach to inferring utility functions in sensorimotor control. PLoS Biol, 2(10), e330.
  • Körding, K. P., Fukunaga, I., Howard, I. S., Ingram, J. N., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). A neuroeconomics approach to inferring utility functions in sensorimotor control. PLoS Biology, 2(10), e330.
  • Lee, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: Making risky choices in the brain. Nat Neurosci, 8(9), 1129-1130.
  • Lee, D. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Best to go with what you know? Nature, 441(7095), 822-823.
  • Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2006). What is 'neuromarketing'? A discussion and agenda for future research. Int J Psychophysiol.
  • Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is `neuromarketing'? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199-204.
  • Marschner, A., Mell, T., Wartenburger, I., Villringer, A., Reischies, F. M., & Heekeren, H. R. (2005). Reward-based decision-making and aging. Brain Res Bull, 67(5), 382-390.
  • McCoy, A. N., & Platt, M. L. (2004). Expectations and outcomes: Decision-making in the primate brain. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol.
  • Oullier, O., & Kelso, J. A. (2006). Neuroeconomics and the metastable brain. Trends Cogn Sci, 10(8), 353-354.
  • Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999). Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature, 400(6741), 238.
  • Rustichini, A. (2005). Neuroeconomics: Present and future. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 201.
  • Rustichini, A., Dickhaut, J., Ghirardato, P., Smith, K., & Pardo, J. (2005). A brain imaging study of the choice procedure. Games and Economic Behavior, In Press, Corrected Proof.
  • Sanfey, A. G., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci, 10(3), 108-116.
  • Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758.
  • Schultz, W. (2004). Neural coding of basic reward terms of animal learning theory, game theory, microeconomics and behavioural ecology. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 14(2), 147.
  • Smith, K., & Dickhaut, J. (2005). Economics and emotion: Institutions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, In Press, Corrected Proof.
  • Spinella, M., Lester, D., & Yang, B. (2004). Gambling and delaying rewards as a function of frontal system dysfunction: A study in neuroeconomics. Percept Mot Skills, 99(3 Pt 1), 993-994.
  • Spinella, M., Lester, D., & Yang, B. (2005). Predicting credit card behavior: A study in neuroeconomics. Percept Mot Skills, 100(3 Pt 1), 777-778.
  • Spinella, M., Lester, D., & Yang, B. (2006). Prefrontal cortex dysfunction and income: A study in neuroeconomics. Psychol Rep, 98(1), 37-38.
  • Stuphorn, V. (2005). Neuroeconomics: The shadow of the future. Curr Biol, 15(7), R247-249.
  • Stuphorn, V. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Cardinal utility in the orbitofrontal cortex? Curr Biol, 16(15), R591-593.
  • Sugrue, L. P., Corrado, G. S., & Newsome, W. T. (2005). Choosing the greater of two goods: Neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci, 6(5), 363-375.
  • Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time-perception. Med Hypotheses, 65(4), 691-693.
  • Takahashi, T. (2006). Time-estimation error following weber-fechner law may explain subadditive time-discounting. Med Hypotheses.
  • Takahashi, T. (2006). Non-reciprocal altruism may be attributable to hyperbolicity in social discounting function. Med Hypotheses.
  • Takahashi, T. (2006). Queuing theory under competitive social foraging may explain a mathematical equivalence of delay and probability in impulsive decision-making. Med Hypotheses, 67(2), 276-279.
  • Takahashi, T. (2006). A mathematical framework for probabilistic choice based on information theory and psychophysics. Med Hypotheses, 67(1), 183-186.
  • Takahashi, T., Sakaguchi, K., Oki, M., Homma, S., & Hasegawa, T. (2006). Testosterone levels and discounting delayed monetary gains and losses in male humans. Neuro Endocrinol Lett, 27(4).
  • Tobler, P., Fiorillo, C., & Schultz, W. (2005). Adaptive coding of reward value by dopamine neurons. Science, 307(5715), 1645.
  • van 't Wout, M., Kahn, R. S., Sanfey, A. G., & Aleman, A. (2006). Affective state and decision-making in the ultimatum game. Exp Brain Res, 169(4), 564-568.
  • Walter, H., Abler, B., Ciaramidaro, A., & Erk, S. (2005). Motivating forces of human actions. Neuroimaging reward and social interaction. Brain Res Bull, 67(5), 368-381.
  • Wolpert, D. M., Ingram, J. N., Howard, I. S., Fukunaga, I., & Körding, K. P. (2004). A neuroeconomics approach to inferring utility functions in sensorimotor control. PLoS Biology, 2(10), e330.
  • Yang, B., Lester, D., & Spinella, M. (2006). Neurotransmitter-related personality traits and money attitudes: A study in neuroeconomics. Psychol Rep, 98(1), 21-22.
  • Yang, B., Spinella, M., & Lester, D. (2004). Credit card use and prefrontal cortex dysfunction: A study in neuroeconomics. Psychol Rep, 94(3 Pt 2), 1267-1268.
  • Zak, P. J. (2004). Neuroeconomics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 359(1451), 1737-1748.
  • Zak, P. J., & Fakhar, A. (2006). Neuroactive hormones and interpersonal trust: International evidence. Econ Hum Biol.
  • Zak, P. J., Kurzban, R., & Matzner, W. T. (2004). The neurobiology of trust. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1032, 224-227.
  • Zak, P. J., Kurzban, R., & Matzner, W. T. (2005). Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. Horm Behav, 48(5), 522-527.