NOTICE: Citizendium is still being set up on its newer server, treat as a beta for now; please see here for more.
Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free. Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. --

Holomorphic function/Proofs

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
< Holomorphic function
Revision as of 20:17, 8 December 2009 by Chris Day (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Proofs [?]
 
More information on Proofs relevant to holomorphic function.

Proof that holomorphic functions are analytic

In complex analysis, a field of mathematics, a complex-valued function f of a complex variable

  • is holomorphic at a point a iff it is differentiable at every point within some open disk centered at a, and
  • is analytic at a if in some open disk centered at a it can be expanded as a convergent power series
(this implies that the radius of convergence is positive).

One of the most important theorems of complex analysis is that holomorphic functions are analytic. Among the corollaries of this theorem are

  • the fact that two holomorphic functions that agree at every point of an infinite set with an accumulation point inside the intersection of their domains also agree everywhere in some open set, and
  • the fact that, since power series are infinitely differentiable, so are holomorphic functions (this is in contrast to the case of real differentiable functions), and
  • the fact that the radius of convergence is always the distance from the center a to the nearest singularity; if there are no singularities (i.e., if f is an entire function), then the radius of convergence is infinite. Strictly speaking, this is not a corollary of the theorem but rather a by-product of the proof.

Proof

The argument, first given by Cauchy, hinges on Cauchy's integral formula and the power series development of the expression

Suppose f is differentiable everywhere within some open disk centered at a. Let z be within that open disk. Let C be a positively oriented (i.e., counterclockwise) circle centered at a, lying within that open disk but farther from a than z is. Starting with Cauchy's integral formula, we have

The interchange of the sum and the integeral is justified by the uniform convergence of the geometric series within subsets of its disk of convergence that are bounded away from the boundary. Since the factor (za)n does not depend on the variable of integration w, it can be pulled out:

And now the integral and the factor of 1/(2πi) do not depend on z, i.e., as a function of z, that whole expression is a constant cn, so we can write:

and that is the desired power series.

Remarks

  • Since power series can be differentiated term-wise, applying the above argument in the reverse direction and the power series expression for
gives
This is a Cauchy integral formula for derivatives. Therefore the power series obtained above is the Taylor series of f.
  • The argument works if z is any point that is closer to the center a than is any singularity of f. Therefore the radius of convergence of the Taylor series cannot be smaller than the distance from a to the nearest singularity (nor can it be larger, since power series have no singularities in the interiors of their circles of convergence).
  • A special case of the identity theorem follows from the preceding remark. If two holomorphic functions agree on a (possibly quite small) open neighborhood U of a, then they coincide on the open disk Bd(a), where d is the distance from a to the nearest singularity.

External links