User talk:Jochen Wendebaum: Difference between revisions
imported>D. Matt Innis (Engineering) |
imported>Hendra I. Nurdin (Engineering not yet ready for approval) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Hii Jochen, I noticed a ToApprove template that you placed on the [[Engineering]] article dated for 10/10/2007. Did you mean 7/10/2007? Or was ther e areason you were waiting till October? --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 01:24, 9 September 2007 (CDT) | Hii Jochen, I noticed a ToApprove template that you placed on the [[Engineering]] article dated for 10/10/2007. Did you mean 7/10/2007? Or was ther e areason you were waiting till October? --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 01:24, 9 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Delaying approval for Engineering article== | |||
Hi Jochen, I noticed that a fellow Citizen recently suggested that the engineering article in its present form is not ready for approval. Therefore, I think it may be a good idea to delay approval of this article until the issues raised have been looked at carefully and resolved. Please let me know your thoughts on this, thanks. [[User:Hendra I. Nurdin|Hendra I. Nurdin]] 20:21, 4 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:21, 4 October 2007
Danke fürs korrigieren von Galileo! Stefan Sels 06:45, 9 November 2006 (CST)
Grüße! Damit sind wir schonmal 3 für die deutschsprachigen Teil. Wie koordinieren wir uns am besten? Die englischsprachige Version hat ja noch vehemente Fehler (Text über Potsdam ist z.B. noch grausam), - aber eben auch Versäumnisse, zum Beispiel fehlt halt bei der Würdigung der DDR noch ein größerer Teil zum Leben, aber auch zur Kontrolle der Bevölkerung.Sönke Klinger 16:45, 10 November 2006 (MET)
Danke sehr fuer Deine Hilfe! --Larry Sanger 08:57, 6 September 2007 (CDT)
Engineering
Hii Jochen, I noticed a ToApprove template that you placed on the Engineering article dated for 10/10/2007. Did you mean 7/10/2007? Or was ther e areason you were waiting till October? --Matt Innis (Talk) 01:24, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
Delaying approval for Engineering article
Hi Jochen, I noticed that a fellow Citizen recently suggested that the engineering article in its present form is not ready for approval. Therefore, I think it may be a good idea to delay approval of this article until the issues raised have been looked at carefully and resolved. Please let me know your thoughts on this, thanks. Hendra I. Nurdin 20:21, 4 October 2007 (CDT)