User talk:CZCharterVote: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (→another test to see if it emails itself: new section) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (deleted test) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::I suggest that you contact [[User:Joe Quick]] or some other Citizen about your proposals. He/they/or you yourselves can do it. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 19:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC) | :::I suggest that you contact [[User:Joe Quick]] or some other Citizen about your proposals. He/they/or you yourselves can do it. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 19:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:31, 5 October 2009
Vote counting procedures
I do not wish to suggest in any way that there will be any impropriety when the draft committee ballots are counted. However, it would be prudent that the procedures used for this are fully transparent. Specifically, assurance that more than one constable will count the ballots would increase confidence in the balloting process. Making this public on the CZCharterVote page (and not just this talk page) would further ensure transparency of the process. Dan Nessett 18:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I hope that this will be stated and implemented. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 18:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
- I suggest that you contact User:Joe Quick or some other Citizen about your proposals. He/they/or you yourselves can do it. Hayford Peirce 19:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC)