Toxic, infectious or radiological compounds: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
Originally defined by the U.S. military,  the term '''toxic, infectious or radiological compounds (TIM)''', defined as [[hazardous materials]], in solid, liquid, aerosolized, or gaseous form; it can also stand for toxic industrial material, which  be used or stored for use for industrial, commercial, medical, military or domestic purposes, and released with an [[improvised explosive device]] or tampering with containers and used for [[terrorism]]" has taken on more general applicability. <ref name=JP3-41>{{citation
| url = http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp3_41.pdf
| title = Joint Publication 3-41: Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High-Yield Explosives Consequence Management
| publisher = [[Joint Chiefs of Staff]]
| date = 2 October 2006}}</ref>  The idea points out that accidents such as the [[Bhopal disaster]], improvised chemical attacks in Iraq such as an explosive attacked to a [[chlorine]]-carrying tank truck, or a gas release from a volcano or lake require a response similar to that required to a purpose-built [[chemical weapon]].
==References==
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 10:51, 28 June 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Originally defined by the U.S. military, the term toxic, infectious or radiological compounds (TIM), defined as hazardous materials, in solid, liquid, aerosolized, or gaseous form; it can also stand for toxic industrial material, which be used or stored for use for industrial, commercial, medical, military or domestic purposes, and released with an improvised explosive device or tampering with containers and used for terrorism" has taken on more general applicability. [1] The idea points out that accidents such as the Bhopal disaster, improvised chemical attacks in Iraq such as an explosive attacked to a chlorine-carrying tank truck, or a gas release from a volcano or lake require a response similar to that required to a purpose-built chemical weapon.

References