Terrorism/Approval

{{{ToA editor}}} nominated this article for approval. An unknown workgroup oversaw this approval

This artcle is first nominated version 100127060 for approval by Politics editor Richard Jensen using the individual approval method. --Matt Innis (Talk) 20:48, 29 June 2007 (CDT)

In short, we must find a terrorism expert to approve this article. My apologies, again. --Larry Sanger 11:19, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

As per my own earllier suggestion on Richard Jensen's Talk page, I have written to Professor Michael Nacht at UC Berkeley, asking him if he would be willing to have a look at this article. If, by extraordinary good fortune, he is willing to comment on it, I will forward his comments and post them here. If we are even more lucky, perhaps he would consider joining us as an editor. It's a long shot, but I thought it worth a try, as this seems a strong entry in an important area; should we be favored with any comments, positive or negative, I'm sure they would be of great value. Russell Potter 17:14, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

I agree that the comments would be welcome, but I've received sufficient evidence of Richard Jensen's own expertise on the topic. --Larry Sanger 18:59, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

This article is approved under the individual editor rules for the version number 100130685 with the approving editor Richard Jensen for the Military and History workgroups. --Matt Innis (Talk) 22:17, 6 July 2007 (CDT)