Talk:Voltage

Article Checklist for "Voltage"

Workgroup category or categories	Physics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status	Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article?	No
Basic cleanup done?	Yes
Checklist last edited by	Derek Harkness 09:53, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.

---

Being only a lay person, I find analogies a great help in understanding technical and scientific matters.

I would like an explanation of what is illustrated by different forms of the analogy of pysical topology: a slope and its steepness and length; a precipice and its height; in terms of flowing water, the volume of water in the flow? -- Janos Abel 16:59, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

Possible analogy

A potential is a scalar function whose gradiant (or directional derivative) is equal to a vector field (typically force). In the case of voltage, force is given by Coulomb's law

$F={\frac {Cq_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}}$

and in the case of gravitation, force is given by Newton's law

$F={\frac {Gm_{1}m_{2}}{r^{2}}}$

The two situations are analogous, except that charge can be positive or negative, but mass cannot. In either case, the potential is just the force per unit charge (or mass). When an electron and proton are moved apart, the attractive force goes down, but the distance increases. An easy thing to remember is that in the potential one charge disappears, and the potential difference is proportional to 1/r. Formally,

${\frac {d}{dr}}\left({\frac {1}{r}}\right)=-{\frac {1}{r^{2}}}$

Now, back to the analogy: the potential depends on the height, but is independent of the mass because it measures the gravitational attraction the earth exerts per unit mass. Greg Woodhouse 17:48, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

I should add that th radius of the earth is quite large, and so it basically "swamps" the other factors here, and that explains why (near the earth's surface) the acceleration due to gravity (basically, the potential) is a constant 9.8 meters per second squared (or 32 feet per second squared). Greg Woodhouse 17:54, 6 June 2007 (CDT)