Talk:Polynomial: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Greg Woodhouse
imported>Sébastien Moulin
(→‎Creation of the article: to rewrite from scratch?)
Line 22: Line 22:


I have a question: From your description of the ring <math> R[X]</math> it appears that you have in mind the ring of formal power series, which I would usually write <math>R[[x]]</math>. iss that correct, or am I trying to read too much into an evolving article? [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 09:18, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
I have a question: From your description of the ring <math> R[X]</math> it appears that you have in mind the ring of formal power series, which I would usually write <math>R[[x]]</math>. iss that correct, or am I trying to read too much into an evolving article? [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 09:18, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
:I said I planned to continue this work, but finally I won't, leaving the Citizendium for reasons unrelated to mathematics. I wrote this sketch about polynomials on impulse, and I am now dissatisfied with the result, which may put too much emphasis about the formal aspect of things. In short, it looks more like a boring Bourbaki-like lecture than like a vivid introduction to the subject. I realized that while writing and that is the reason why I stopped in the middle of a section. I wondered about placing a 'speedy delete' template on the article but it may not be an appropriate case for doing so. So I leave to you to decide if it is better to restart the article from scratch or to try to improve the current version. I don't mind about either choice. Regards, --[[User:Sébastien_Moulin|Sébastien Moulin]] <small>[[User_talk:Sébastien_Moulin|(talk me)]]</small> 08:08, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 08:08, 19 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Polynomial"
Workgroup category or categories Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Sébastien Moulin (talk me) 10:47, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Creation of the article

I just created this article and it is far from being finished. First, feel free to correct spelling or style (I am not so used to write in English). In case you are not sure about such a correction (for instance if you are not familiar with mathematics), just drop me a message on my talk page.

The article may evolve a lot in the future, I just tried to be bold writing this! I tried to write lively prose, not "encyclopedese", but I am not sure how the general tone fits with the Citizendium's standards (for instance, is the use of "we" ok ?). I also tried to make the text readable for a non specialist as much as I could but I do not know if I succeeded. For the time being, the article just gives a very abstract definition of polynomials without showing why it is useful! Maybe this part about the construction of algebras of polynomials should form an article in itself and only be summarized in the main article (for later parts, like the arithmetics one, it is even more obvious than a devoted article is needed). But for now, I guess this is better than a mere red link anyway.

I plan to continue to work on this article, the whole structure may evolve a lot, and the paragraph entitled "The algebra " is (obviously) unfinished.

--Sébastien Moulin (talk me) 10:47, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

I have a question: From your description of the ring it appears that you have in mind the ring of formal power series, which I would usually write . iss that correct, or am I trying to read too much into an evolving article? Greg Woodhouse 09:18, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

I said I planned to continue this work, but finally I won't, leaving the Citizendium for reasons unrelated to mathematics. I wrote this sketch about polynomials on impulse, and I am now dissatisfied with the result, which may put too much emphasis about the formal aspect of things. In short, it looks more like a boring Bourbaki-like lecture than like a vivid introduction to the subject. I realized that while writing and that is the reason why I stopped in the middle of a section. I wondered about placing a 'speedy delete' template on the article but it may not be an appropriate case for doing so. So I leave to you to decide if it is better to restart the article from scratch or to try to improve the current version. I don't mind about either choice. Regards, --Sébastien Moulin (talk me) 08:08, 19 April 2007 (CDT)