Talk:History of England/Timelines: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Peter Jackson
(→‎General: new section)
Line 10: Line 10:


:: I suggest deletion of just that passage. Its removal would not cause readers any significant loss of understanding, and it  would avoid causing them possible confusion. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 14:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
:: I suggest deletion of just that passage. Its removal would not cause readers any significant loss of understanding, and it  would avoid causing them possible confusion. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 14:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
== General ==
I've now finished going through correcting or clarifying the worst problems. It's still far from satisfactory. For example, the selection of entries seems quite arbitrary at times. Why do we have a list of early Scottish kings but only a few later ones? Etc.[[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 16:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:39, 5 July 2012

citation needed

A citation is needed for the statement "most legal authorities had in fact held slavery illegal in England since the early 17th century." especially in view of the continuation of the practice throughout the 18th century Nick Gardner 08:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

There's often a discrepancy between law and reality. I think this was in the source I cited, but I'll check, probably this afternoon. Peter Jackson 08:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
PS. As late as 1827, the Privy Council ruled (in what's known as Grace's Case) that a slave who'd "voluntarily" returned from England to the West Indies was still a slave over there. Peter Jackson 08:49, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
No, it's not there. Can't remember where I read it. I've tried a few places and will see if I can find more. I suppose it's not essential to include this background here anyway. Peter Jackson 13:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
I suggest deletion of just that passage. Its removal would not cause readers any significant loss of understanding, and it would avoid causing them possible confusion. Nick Gardner 14:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

General

I've now finished going through correcting or clarifying the worst problems. It's still far from satisfactory. For example, the selection of entries seems quite arbitrary at times. Why do we have a list of early Scottish kings but only a few later ones? Etc.Peter Jackson 16:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)