Talk:Geophysics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dhananjay Ravat
No edit summary
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Geophysics
|                cat1 = Earth Sciences
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 21:21, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
The list of important publications in here grossly incomplete and not very useful for readers wanting to find out about the topics.
The list of important publications in here grossly incomplete and not very useful for readers wanting to find out about the topics.



Revision as of 21:21, 8 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Geophysics"
Workgroup category or categories Earth Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 21:21, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





The list of important publications in here grossly incomplete and not very useful for readers wanting to find out about the topics.

I suggest removing it for now and then adding a better list later.

After this I believe this can go live. Dhananjay Ravat 06:46, 8 November 2006 (CST)


As an encyclopedia article, a definition plus a list does not strike me as adequate. Shouldn't there at least be a longer introduction to the subject areas and methods of geophysics? --Larry Sanger 22:52, 7 November 2006 (CST)


Since there can always be links to more specifics (and there are already a few), I thought this would be enough with a few changes. But I will think about what more one could add without getting distracted from the primary message. In my opinion, people have very little time to read these days, and a longer version of a broad discipline like Geophysics cannot be done without bias and without a lot of thought. (If I were writing a paper encyclopedia entry for this topic, it would take me a month to achieve a good article.) So the persons who had written the previous version had done a reasonably good job in my opinion, but I just made a few corrections and some reorganization. Dhananjay Ravat 06:46, 8 November 2006 (CST)