Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- '''Intelligent design''' ('''ID''') is the claim that fundamental features of the [[universe]] an ...rom the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition (1999)].'</ref> See [[intelligent design movement]] for an account of political efforts to promote education about41 KB (6,423 words) - 10:03, 14 February 2021
- ...that I can't support. Non-scientists will not understand the charge that Intelligent Design is "untestable" or that ID doesn't make predictions. By gutting their argu ...e universe and living things are best explained by an intelligent cause. [[intelligent design movement | Proponents of ID]] generally evidence this claim by pointing to186 KB (30,768 words) - 13:37, 19 February 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design]]32 bytes (3 words) - 23:33, 24 May 2007
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 07:17, 17 May 2007
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design movement]]41 bytes (4 words) - 08:33, 17 May 2007
- 145 bytes (19 words) - 05:02, 1 July 2008
- ...r that they are referring to the Christian God.. If it is the god that the intelligent design ''movement'' is referring to , then it'' is'' the Christian God, isn't it? ...din fitting for this article. He may have advocated a form of "lower case" intelligent design, but he's certainly not advocating the same sort of thing as Behe, Dembski16 KB (2,642 words) - 21:14, 25 July 2011
- | pagename = Intelligent design | abc = Intelligent design830 bytes (66 words) - 17:39, 13 September 2020
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 19:43, 3 November 2007
- * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006) * [[Robert T. Pennock|Pennock, Robert T.]] ''Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics'' (2001, MIT Press)2 KB (291 words) - 07:22, 25 August 2008
- The '''Intelligent Design movement''' is a political movement designed to weaken Darwinism, especiall ...re best explained by purposeful causation — a "higher intelligence." See [[intelligent design]] for a better explanation of these claims, and why they are not supported20 KB (3,035 words) - 07:31, 20 April 2024
- 152 bytes (19 words) - 11:52, 2 February 2023
- ...really get this item. ''Why'' shouldn't theological considerations about intelligent design be permitted? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:28, 26 February 2007 Bleh, does someone know how to capitalise Intelligent Design correctly in this article. Should there be a distinction between the moveme104 KB (17,261 words) - 10:49, 27 May 2007
- :''See also: [[Intelligent design/Bibliography|Intelligent Design > Bibliography]]'' * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006)809 bytes (101 words) - 14:27, 26 September 2008
- ...les. He sees no conflict in religion and Evolution and no conflict between Intelligent Design and science. We enjoyed a fascinating discussion on this topic yesterday be ...r [[Intelligent design explanation]]? Or [[Intelligent design idea]]? Or [[Intelligent design proposal]]? Just trying to avoid 'theory'. [[User:John Stephenson|John Step102 KB (16,719 words) - 10:49, 27 May 2007
- | pagename = Intelligent design movement | abc = Intelligent design movement845 bytes (85 words) - 08:38, 15 March 2024
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 19:46, 3 November 2007
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}243 bytes (32 words) - 09:48, 25 March 2024
- ...al report reprinted from ''Natural History'' magazine. Three proponents of intelligent design present their views. Each view is followed by a response from a proponent o *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10545387/ Judge rules against ‘intelligent design’] msnbc.com988 bytes (126 words) - 10:40, 25 October 2010
- *[[Intelligent design]]719 bytes (109 words) - 05:25, 26 September 2008
Page text matches
- ...al report reprinted from ''Natural History'' magazine. Three proponents of intelligent design present their views. Each view is followed by a response from a proponent o *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10545387/ Judge rules against ‘intelligent design’] msnbc.com988 bytes (126 words) - 10:40, 25 October 2010
- :''See also: [[Intelligent design/Bibliography|Intelligent Design > Bibliography]]'' * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006)809 bytes (101 words) - 14:27, 26 September 2008
- == ACLU and "intelligent design" == ...rnmental agency tried to use governmental power to silence a proponent of "intelligent design," the ACLU would defend that person's free-speech rights. So perhaps should808 bytes (118 words) - 19:20, 20 October 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design]]32 bytes (3 words) - 23:33, 24 May 2007
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design movement]]41 bytes (4 words) - 08:33, 17 May 2007
- | pagename = Intelligent design | abc = Intelligent design830 bytes (66 words) - 17:39, 13 September 2020
- Conservative think-tank based in Seattle; best-known for promoting [[intelligent design]] creationism.138 bytes (14 words) - 01:42, 5 January 2009
- * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006) * [[Robert T. Pennock|Pennock, Robert T.]] ''Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics'' (2001, MIT Press)2 KB (291 words) - 07:22, 25 August 2008
- | pagename = Intelligent design movement | abc = Intelligent design movement845 bytes (85 words) - 08:38, 15 March 2024
- ...d against views that are incompatible with metaphysical naturalism, namely intelligent design.1 KB (203 words) - 18:34, 17 December 2009
- {{rpl|Intelligent design}}128 bytes (18 words) - 05:09, 24 September 2013
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}} {{r|Intelligent design}}729 bytes (94 words) - 18:36, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}243 bytes (32 words) - 09:48, 25 March 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}225 bytes (27 words) - 11:01, 15 April 2024
- {{r|intelligent design}}221 bytes (28 words) - 14:06, 12 August 2008
- {{r|intelligent design}}166 bytes (20 words) - 18:20, 26 January 2009
- ...a, but is best known for being the institutional home of many promoters of intelligent design. It receives significant sums from a variety of conservative foundations in ...gn proponentsists".</ref>. The Discovery Institute fellows responsible for Intelligent Design advocacy include Phillip E. Johnson, Stephen C. Meyer, Jonathan Wells, Will3 KB (486 words) - 01:55, 27 March 2024
- *[[Intelligent design]]719 bytes (109 words) - 05:25, 26 September 2008
- Could there be some confusion with Kitzmiller v. Dover, a case on [[intelligent design]] where, I believe, those opposing the ID position were charged with being428 bytes (65 words) - 13:56, 22 March 2009
- {{r|Intelligent Design}}320 bytes (41 words) - 05:31, 28 August 2009