Ibn Tamiyya: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "al Qaeda" to "Al-Qaeda")
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}}
'''Ibn Tamiyya'''  (1263?-1328), formally Taqi al-Deen Ahmad Ibn Taymiyya, is seen as the theoretical father of modern Salafism, a radically conservative form of Islam.  Part of the [[Hanbali]] school of Islam, he wrote on the necessity of armed [[jihad]] against foreign invasion of Islamic lands; he suggested that armed jihad should be added to the pillars of Islam. He also condemned [[Sufism]]. [[Wahhabism]] also draws on his thinking.
'''Ibn Tamiyya'''  (1263?-1328), formally Taqi al-Deen Ahmad Ibn Taymiyya, is seen as the theoretical father of modern Salafism, a radically conservative form of Islam.  Part of the [[Hanbali]] school of Islam, he wrote on the necessity of armed [[jihad]] against foreign invasion of Islamic lands; he suggested that armed jihad should be added to the pillars of Islam. He also condemned [[Sufism]]. [[Wahhabism]] also draws on his thinking.



Revision as of 17:02, 14 March 2024

This article may be deleted soon.
To oppose or discuss a nomination, please go to CZ:Proposed for deletion and follow the instructions.

For the monthly nomination lists, see
Category:Articles for deletion.


This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Ibn Tamiyya (1263?-1328), formally Taqi al-Deen Ahmad Ibn Taymiyya, is seen as the theoretical father of modern Salafism, a radically conservative form of Islam. Part of the Hanbali school of Islam, he wrote on the necessity of armed jihad against foreign invasion of Islamic lands; he suggested that armed jihad should be added to the pillars of Islam. He also condemned Sufism. Wahhabism also draws on his thinking.

His core argument was expressed in urging Muslim fight against the Mongol invasion (1294-1303), in spite of protests that the Mongol monarch had converted to Islam. That king, however, allowed Mongol tribal law to coexist with Sharia, making him an apostate and a legitimate target of jihad. [1]

By requiring there to be no Muslim society without Islamic law, he set a context that Salafists used to justify rebellion against Muslim rulers that did not enforce that law, and was cited by the assassins of Anwar Sadat.[2]

References