Category talk:Chess: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Denis Cavanagh No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I don't think its a bad idea. After all he is 'being bold' :-) [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:35, 7 January 2008 (CST) | I don't think its a bad idea. After all he is 'being bold' :-) [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:35, 7 January 2008 (CST) | ||
:I'm frankly ambivalent, but if we're going to do it then there needs to be policy and guidelines set up. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:54, 7 January 2008 (CST) | :I'm frankly ambivalent, but if we're going to do it then there needs to be policy and guidelines set up. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:54, 7 January 2008 (CST) | ||
I don't think its completely necessary to 'mobilize the troops' and begin a categorisation rush, but it would be nice to have a few knocking about. I don't think it does any harm. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:59, 7 January 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 10:59, 7 January 2008
I do not believe that we currently employ specific article-level categories in CZ. --Robert W King 09:01, 7 January 2008 (CST)
I don't think its a bad idea. After all he is 'being bold' :-) Denis Cavanagh 09:35, 7 January 2008 (CST)
- I'm frankly ambivalent, but if we're going to do it then there needs to be policy and guidelines set up. --Robert W King 09:54, 7 January 2008 (CST)
I don't think its completely necessary to 'mobilize the troops' and begin a categorisation rush, but it would be nice to have a few knocking about. I don't think it does any harm. Denis Cavanagh 09:59, 7 January 2008 (CST)