Talk:Crop circles

This article appears to me to be Original Research, extremely biased, completely unscientific, and a ripe candidate for either extreme rewriting with extreme skepticism -- or complete deletion. Hayford Peirce 20:20, 31 July 2007 (CDT)

You are kidding. Obviously you have not read any of the literature nor have a grasp on the scientific methodologies conducted by dozens of real scientists around the world. Be a little more specific. Personally I find your attitude somewhat disturbing like, you want war, let's go Show me your sources.Thomas Mandel 01:29, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

Thomas, this obviously has been taken from [1] -- I am provisionally blanking the article, pending some explanation. I'll be blocking your account as well, without an explanation to the effect that you wrote the original.

There is an obvious and serious problem with the original, which states: "I write this paper with the assumption that a percentage of crop circles are 'authentic' or NOT man made." This is obviously a minority view. --Larry Sanger 06:53, 1 August 2007 (CDT)