Talk:Schröder-Bernstein theorem/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt
(done)
imported>Boris Tsirelson
(four remarks)
Line 3: Line 3:
"Details": "the induced induced image"? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
"Details": "the induced induced image"? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
: Thanks. Corrected. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 12:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
: Thanks. Corrected. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 12:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
"Proof:Proof":
: <math>  S_1 \subset S \subset A
          \Rightarrow f_\ast (S_1) \subset f_\ast (S)
  </math>
probably should be
: <math>  S_1 \subset S \subset A
          \Rightarrow \sigma_\ast (S_1) \subset \sigma_\ast (S)
  </math>
"Monotone" in general may be understood as "either increasing or decreasing"; it is meant "(momotonely) increasing" or "isotone".
"Proof:Proof":
: "By assumption, there are injective functions (...) that induce..."
I'd say
: "By assumption, there are injective functions (...); they induce..."
because the second part of the phrase is not a part of the assumption (but its consequence).
"Outline": the reader can guess what is denoted by ''f'' and ''g'' (or see the details), but we'd better let him know.
[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 12:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:19, 5 October 2010

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A classic theorem of set theory asserting that sets can be ordered by size. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

"Details": "the induced induced image"? Boris Tsirelson 06:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Corrected. --Peter Schmitt 12:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

"Proof:Proof":

probably should be

"Monotone" in general may be understood as "either increasing or decreasing"; it is meant "(momotonely) increasing" or "isotone".

"Proof:Proof":

"By assumption, there are injective functions (...) that induce..."

I'd say

"By assumption, there are injective functions (...); they induce..."

because the second part of the phrase is not a part of the assumption (but its consequence).

"Outline": the reader can guess what is denoted by f and g (or see the details), but we'd better let him know.

Boris Tsirelson 12:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)