Talk:Kinston Indians: Difference between revisions
imported>David E. Dalimonte No edit summary |
imported>David E. Dalimonte No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== | ==Citizendium== | ||
I became very disappointed in the very slow progress here in the Sports section. Besides a paragraph on baseball itself, mine is the only article on a baseball topic. There are only about 40 articles in the entire sports workgroup and yet the editors can't seem to find the time to give my article a look. Only four other articles in the sports workgroup lack an article checklist from an editor. Two of those are brief lists. I'm not sure why mine is one of the very few articles not to get even this minimum of attention from editors. It seems as though Citizendium is growing at a glacial pace, and that the only articles that get any attention or feedback are science and traditional history articles. I spent a lot of time and effort creating this article and see no reason why I should not share it with as many people as possible, so I incorporated as much as I could into the wikipedia article on the subject. Guess what? I'm getting help on the article, people add to it, people make comments and suggestions to improve it, people link to it. All the things I hoped would happen here. It's not sitting dead in the water like so many articles over here at citizendium. Good luck. | |||
Revision as of 06:58, 26 May 2007
Source Note
PLEASE NOTE: Major portions of the history section (especially the paragraphs concerning 1962-present) of this article were originally written by me for another website[1] . As the creator of the original article, I hereby grant permission for its use on citizendium - or anywhere else for that matter.David E. Dalimonte 15:12, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
Citizendium
I became very disappointed in the very slow progress here in the Sports section. Besides a paragraph on baseball itself, mine is the only article on a baseball topic. There are only about 40 articles in the entire sports workgroup and yet the editors can't seem to find the time to give my article a look. Only four other articles in the sports workgroup lack an article checklist from an editor. Two of those are brief lists. I'm not sure why mine is one of the very few articles not to get even this minimum of attention from editors. It seems as though Citizendium is growing at a glacial pace, and that the only articles that get any attention or feedback are science and traditional history articles. I spent a lot of time and effort creating this article and see no reason why I should not share it with as many people as possible, so I incorporated as much as I could into the wikipedia article on the subject. Guess what? I'm getting help on the article, people add to it, people make comments and suggestions to improve it, people link to it. All the things I hoped would happen here. It's not sitting dead in the water like so many articles over here at citizendium. Good luck.