Talk:Jackrat terrier: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jitse Niesen m (Automatic edit (limited test run over ten articles; see User:Jitse Niesen/Subpagination for details): Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Jackrat Terrier" to "Jackrat terrier") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== "Breed" to be interpreted strictly == | == "Breed" to be interpreted strictly == | ||
I'm going to take a firm stance on the use of the word "breed" to refer especially to dogs, because otherwise we are going to be overrun with crosses and hybrids. There are enough bona fide breeds that need documenting. | I'm going to take a firm stance on the use of the word "breed" to refer especially to dogs, because otherwise we are going to be overrun with crosses and hybrids. There are enough bona fide breeds that need documenting. | ||
"Jackrat | "Jackrat terriers" are crosses; they are not a breed. | ||
For that reason I put them low on the priority of dog breed articles. | For that reason I put them low on the priority of dog breed articles. | ||
[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 17:47, 7 August 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 17:47, 7 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:48, 8 March 2024
"Breed" to be interpreted strictly
I'm going to take a firm stance on the use of the word "breed" to refer especially to dogs, because otherwise we are going to be overrun with crosses and hybrids. There are enough bona fide breeds that need documenting.
"Jackrat terriers" are crosses; they are not a breed.
For that reason I put them low on the priority of dog breed articles.
Aleta Curry 17:47, 7 August 2007 (CDT)