User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Editorial policies: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (quote)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AccountNotLive}}
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}
<center>'''''Apparently, people are realizing that a much more open post-publication peer review process, where anyone can take part, is a lot more effective'''&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp; [http://techdirt.com/articles/20100812/03472410604.shtml Mike Masnick]''</center>





Latest revision as of 02:41, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.



The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Session start · Talk start · Quotes · Background · Wikis as science communication platforms ·
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo


  Wikipedia Citizendium Scholarpedia Encyclopedia of Earth Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics PLoS ONE
Scope of site All human knowledge All human knowledge Starting out with a few core areas but potentially all scholarly knowledge Earth sciences Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Starting out with biomedicine but potentially all scholarly knowledge
Original research No Possibly No No Only Only
License CC-BY-SA CC-BY-SA mostly © but also CC-BY-NC-ND and GFDL CC-BY-SA CC-BY CC-BY
Review model Public; post publication Public; post publication Public; post publication Non-public; pre publication Public; post technical, pre formal publication Non-public; pre publication
Anonymity of authors Default; site-wide No; site-wide No for primary authors, yes for other contributors; per article No No No
Anonymity of reviewers Default; site-wide No; site-wide Possible; per article No Possible; per comment Yes
Minimal qualification to submit an article for review None None Invitation or community election, based on specialist expertise None None None
Minimal qualification to review None Generalist expertise (typically PhD) in the field Invitation based on specialist expertise Invitation based on specialist expertise Invitation based on specialist expertise Invitation based on specialist expertise
Minimal qualification to modify content before review None None None None None None
Minimal qualification to modify reviewed content None Generalist expertise (typically PhD) in the field Approval by curator Generalist expertise (typically PhD) in the field N.A. N.A. for PDF version; None for annotations
Metrics at site/ article/ contributor level Built in but outsourced to reduce server load Built in Built in; see also the site-specific Scholar Index as well as Wikigenes Built in Yes (IF)/ Not public / No Yes (IF)/ Public / No