Talk:Archive:Community Pages: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger (Moved talk to talk) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==New user observation== | |||
Hi Larry. Something that struck me as I have been educating myself about CZ these recent days has been the absence of a left menu "Help" link in the basic CZ page template. "Support" was the closest but that was not it. When I have wanted to learn something (either editing tips or policy matters) I have needed to hunt them down. I notice a help section mentioned above but thought it worth mentioning that a 'one-click' "Help" as a single line link at left of every page would really (ahem) help. --[[User:Ian Johnson|Ian Johnson]] 10:11, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
I ran into the same problem. Seems that all editing help- should be accessible from any edit page. I may have missed it, but I couldn't find editing help until I went to the main list of everything. [[User:Thomas Mandel|Thomas Mandel]] 19:01, 3 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
== Help vs. policy == | |||
Help v policy - I think there are clear instances of help pages, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words would be a good example. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 16:45, 3 September 2007 (CDT) | Help v policy - I think there are clear instances of help pages, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words would be a good example. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 16:45, 3 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Right, but there is no clear way to draw the distinction. "Technical instructions" blend into policy instructions without any clear line at all. Besides, the word "Help" does not describe technical instructions somehow ''better'' than it describes policy and process instructions. This is just a plain old simplification move. We need to do a lot of simplification... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:38, 3 September 2007 (CDT) | Right, but there is no clear way to draw the distinction. "Technical instructions" blend into policy instructions without any clear line at all. Besides, the word "Help" does not describe technical instructions somehow ''better'' than it describes policy and process instructions. This is just a plain old simplification move. We need to do a lot of simplification... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:38, 3 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:42, 3 September 2007
New user observation
Hi Larry. Something that struck me as I have been educating myself about CZ these recent days has been the absence of a left menu "Help" link in the basic CZ page template. "Support" was the closest but that was not it. When I have wanted to learn something (either editing tips or policy matters) I have needed to hunt them down. I notice a help section mentioned above but thought it worth mentioning that a 'one-click' "Help" as a single line link at left of every page would really (ahem) help. --Ian Johnson 10:11, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
I ran into the same problem. Seems that all editing help- should be accessible from any edit page. I may have missed it, but I couldn't find editing help until I went to the main list of everything. Thomas Mandel 19:01, 3 September 2007 (CDT)
Help vs. policy
Help v policy - I think there are clear instances of help pages, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words would be a good example. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 16:45, 3 September 2007 (CDT)
Right, but there is no clear way to draw the distinction. "Technical instructions" blend into policy instructions without any clear line at all. Besides, the word "Help" does not describe technical instructions somehow better than it describes policy and process instructions. This is just a plain old simplification move. We need to do a lot of simplification... --Larry Sanger 20:38, 3 September 2007 (CDT)