Talk:Slater determinant: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I copied this article from Wikipedia and removed  numerous errors and inaccuracies. For instance, Hartree did not use spinorbitals, but spatial orbitals. The crucial definition of '''x'''<sub>''i''</sub> is not given.  I entered in the Wiki article a reference to Slater's original 1929 paper in Physical Review. I noticed that some brilliant Wikipedian found it necessary to change it to Physics. Review. Somebody entered an expression with ''det'' in the Wiki version which is completely incomprehensible and wasn't there when I last looked. (If you read Wikipedia frustration in this comment you are right). --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:38, 18 August 2007 (CDT)
{{checklist
|                abc = Slater determinant
|                cat1 = chemistry
|                cat2 = physics
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check =
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = yes
|            cleanup =
|                  by = --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 04:13, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
}}
 
I copied this article from Wikipedia and removed  numerous errors and inaccuracies. For instance, Hartree did not use spinorbitals, but spatial orbitals. The crucial definition of '''x'''<sub>''i''</sub> was not given.  I entered in the Wiki article a reference to Slater's original 1929 paper in Physical Review. I noticed that some Wikipedian changed it to Physics. Review. Somebody entered an expression with ''det'' in the Wiki version which is completely out of place and in wrong fonts. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:38, 18 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:13, 22 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Slater determinant"
Workgroup category or categories chemistry Workgroup, physics Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Paul Wormer 04:13, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I copied this article from Wikipedia and removed numerous errors and inaccuracies. For instance, Hartree did not use spinorbitals, but spatial orbitals. The crucial definition of xi was not given. I entered in the Wiki article a reference to Slater's original 1929 paper in Physical Review. I noticed that some Wikipedian changed it to Physics. Review. Somebody entered an expression with det in the Wiki version which is completely out of place and in wrong fonts. --Paul Wormer 07:38, 18 August 2007 (CDT)