Talk:Social Security in the USA: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(It's absolutely wrong to call the USA program Social security instead of Social Security - the article is *not* about various forms of social security in the USA but about the program itself)
imported>Chris Day
(No difference)

Revision as of 16:36, 27 September 2007


Article Checklist for "Social Security in the USA"
Workgroup category or categories Politics Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Derek Harkness 13:13, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Social Security

has an older history in many other countries besides the USA, you might consider to rename the article to Social Seurity in the US. Contrary to social security in Sweden, the UK, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, France etc etc etc. Robert Tito |  Talk  21:00, 17 May 2007 (CDT)


Request for name change of article

The name of this article is quite wrong. First, it discusses only the USA. Secondly, it fails to explain the major distinctions between social insurance, social assistance and the all-inclusive social security. The article here belongs as a subsidiary page of the USA.

We need a generic article on social security to replace this, with some internationally-relevant analysis.


--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 13:24, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

The article has now been renamed, leaving an empty page for a generic account of Social Security. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:28, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

Sorry, this move is absolutely wrong! It would be like changing the article on the New Deal to New deal. In the USA, the whole *program* is called Social Security, with Caps on *both* words. Trust me.... Hayford Peirce 17:31, 27 September 2007 (CDT)