- The content on this page originated on Wikipedia and is yet to be significantly improved. Contributors are invited to replace and add material to make this an original article.
During 10,000 years of cultivation, numerous forms of wheat have evolved under human selection. This diversity has led to much confusion in the naming of wheats. This article explains how genetic and morphological characteristics of wheat influence its classification, and gives the most common botanical names of wheat in current use (see Table of wheat species). Information on the cultivation and uses of wheat is at the main wheat page.
- 1 Aegilops and Triticum
- 2 Early taxonomy
- 3 Important characters in wheat
- 4 Traditional vs. genetic classifications
- 5 Infraspecific classification
- 6 Advice for users
- 7 Table of wheat species
- 8 Artificial species and mutants
Aegilops and Triticum
The genus Triticum includes the wild and domesticated species usually thought of as wheat.
In the 1950s growing awareness of the genetic similarity (including some shared genomes) of the wild goatgrasses (Aegilops) led some botanists to amalgamate Aegilops and Triticum as one genus, Triticum. This approach is still followed by some (mainly geneticists), but has not been widely adopted by taxonomists. Aegilops is morphologically highly distinct from Triticum, with rounded glumes rather than keeled glumes.
Aegilops is important in wheat evolution because of its role in two important hybridisation events. Wild emmer (T. dicoccoides and T. araraticum) resulted from the hybridisation of a wild wheat, T. urartu, and an as yet unidentified goatgrass, probably similar to Ae. speltoides. Hexaploid wheats (e.g. T. aestivum and T. spelta) are the result of a hybridisation between a domesticated tetraploid wheat, probably T. dicoccum or T. durum, and another goatgrass, Ae. tauschii (also known as Ae. squarrosa).
Botanists of the classical period, such as Columnella, and in sixteenth and seventeenth century herbals, divided wheats into two groups, Triticum corresponding to free-threshing wheats, and Zea corresponding to hulled ('spelt') wheats.
Linneaus recognised five species, all domesticated:
- T. aestivum Bearded spring wheat
- T. hybernum Beardless winter wheat
- T. turgidum Rivet wheat
- T. spelta Spelt wheat
- T. monococcum Einkorn wheat
Later classifications added to the number of species described, but continued to give species status to relatively minor variants, such as winter vs. spring forms. The wild wheats were not described until the mid-19th century because of the poor state of botanical exploration in the Near East, where they grow.
The development of a modern classification depended on the discovery, in the 1920s, that wheat was divided into 3 ploidy levels - that is the number of multiples of the basic haploid set of chromosomes present in the species.
Important characters in wheat
As with many grasses, polyploidy is common in wheat. Some wheats are not polyploid. There are two wild diploid wheats, T. boeoticum and T. urartu. T. boeoticum is the wild ancestor of domesticated einkorn, T. monococcum. Cells of the diploid wheats each contain 2 complements of 7 chromosomes, one from the mother and one from the father (2n=2x=14, where 2n is the number of chromosomes in each somatic cell, and x is the basic chromosome number).
The polyploid wheats are tetraploid (4 sets of chromosomes, 2n=4x=28), or hexaploid (6 sets of chromosomes, 2n=6x=42). The tetraploid wild wheats are wild emmer, T. dicoccoides, and T.araraticum. Wild emmer is the ancestor of all the domesticated tetraploid wheats, with one exception: T. araraticum is the wild ancestor of T. timopheevi.
There are no wild hexaploid wheats, although feral forms of common wheat are sometimes found. Hexaploid wheats evolved under domestication. Genetic analysis has shown that the original hexaploid wheats were the result of a cross between a tetraploid domesticated wheat, such as T. dicoccum or T. durum, and a wild goatgrass, Ae. tauschii.
Polyploidy is important to wheat classification for three reasons:
- Wheats within one ploidy level will be more closely related to each other.
- Ploidy level influences some plant characteristics. For example, higher levels of ploidy tend to be linked to larger cell size.
- Polyploidy brings new genomes into a species. For example, Aegilops tauschii brought the D genome into hexaploid wheats, with enhanced cold-hardiness and some distinctive morphological features.
Observation of chromosome behaviour during meiosis, and the results of hybridisation experiments, have shown that grass genomes (complete complements of genetic matter) can be grouped into distinctive types. Each type has been given a name, e.g. B or D. Grasses sharing the same genome will be more-or-less interfertile, and might be treated by botanists as one species. Identification of genome types is obviously a valuable tool in investigating hybridisation. For example, if two diploid plants hybridise to form a new polyploid form (an allopolyploid), the two original genomes will be present in the new form. Many thousands of years after the original hybridisation event, identification of the component genomes will allow identification of the original parent species.
In Triticum, five genomes, all originally found in diploid species, have been identified:
- Am (sometimes simplified to A)- present in wild einkorn (T. boeoticum) .
- Au (sometimes also simplified to A)- present in T. urartu (closely related to T. boeoticum but not interfertile).
- B - present in most tetraploid wheats. Source not identified and possibly extinct, but similar to Ae. speltoides.
- G - present in timopheevi group of wheats. Source not identified, but similar to Ae. speltoides.
- D - present in Ae. squarrosa, and thus in all hexaploid wheats.
The genetic approach to wheat taxonomy (see below)takes the genome composition as defining each species. As there are five known combinations in Triticum this translates into five super species:
- Am T. monococcum
- Au T. urartu
- BAu T. turgidum
- GAu T. timopheevi
- BAuD, T. aestivum
There are four wild species, all growing in rocky habitats in the fertile crescent of the Near East. All the other species are domesticated. Although relatively few genes control domestication, and wild and domesticated forms are interfertile, wild and domesticated wheats occupy entirely separate habitats. Traditional classification gives more weight to domesticated status.
Hulled vs. Free-threshing
All wild wheats are hulled: they have tough glumes (husks) that tightly enclose the grains. Each package of glumes, lemma and palaea, and grain(s) is known as a spikelet. At maturity the rachis (central stalk of the cereal ear) disarticulates, allowing the spikelets to disperse.
The first domesticated wheats, einkorn and emmer, were hulled like their wild ancestors, but with rachises that (while not entirely tough) did not disarticulate at maturity. During the PPNB period, at about 8000 B.C., free-threshing forms of wheat evolved, with light glumes and fully tough rachis.
Hulled or free-threshing status is important in traditional classification because the different forms are usually grown separately, and have very different post-harvesting processing. Hulled wheats need substantial extra pounding or milling to remove the tough glumes.
For more information, see Wheat: Hulled vs. free-threshing wheat
In addition to hulled/free-threshing status, other morphological criteria, e.g. spike laxness or glume wingedness, are important in defining wheat forms. Some of these are covered in the individual species accounts linked from this page, but printed Floras must be consulted for full descriptions and identification keys.
Traditional vs. genetic classifications
Although the range of recognised types of wheat has been reasonably stable since the 1930s, there are now sharply differing views as to whether these should be recognised at species level (traditional approach) or at subspecific level (genetic approach). The first advocate of the genetic approach was Bowden, in a 1959 classification (now historic rather than current). He, and subsequent proponents (usually geneticists), argued that forms that were interfertile should be treated as one species (the biological species concept). Thus emmer and hard wheat should both be treated as subspecies (or at other infraspecific ranks) of a single tetraploid species defined by the genome BAu. Van Slageren's 1994 classification is probably the most widely used genetic-based classification at present.
Users of traditional classifications give more weight to the separate habitats of the traditional species, which means that species that could hybridise do not, and to morphological characters. There are also pragmatic arguments for this type of classification: it means that most species can be described in Latin binomials, e.g. Triticum aestivum, rather than the trinomials necessary in the genetic system, e.g. Triticum aestivum subsp. aestivum. Both approaches are equally valid and both are widely used.
In the nineteenth century, elaborate schemes of classification were developed in which wheat ears were classified to botanical variety on the basis of morphological criteria such as glume hairiness and colour or grain colour. These variety names are now largely abandoned, but are still sometimes used for distinctive types of wheat such as miracle wheat, a form of T. turgidum with branched ears, known as T. turgidum L. var. mirabile Körn.
The term cultivar (abbreviated as cv.)is often confused with species or domesticate. In fact, it has a precise meaning in botany: it is the term for a distinct population of a crop, usually commercial and resulting from deliberate plant-breeding. Cultivar names are always capitalised, often placed between apostrophes, and not italicised. An example of a cultivar name is T. aestivum cv. 'Pioneer 2163'. A cultivar is often referred to by farmers as a variety, but this is best avoided in print, because of the risk of confusion with botanical varieties.
Advice for users
Anyone wishing to use a botanical name for wheat is best advised to follow an existing classification, such as those listed as current at the Wheat Classification Tables Site. The classifications given in the following table are among those suitable for use. If a genetic classification is favoured, the GRIN classification is comprehensive, based on van Slageren's work but with some extra taxa recognised. If the traditional classification is favoured, Dorofeev's work is a comprehensive scheme that meshes well with other less complete treatments.Wikipedia's wheat pages generally follow a version of the Dorofeev scheme - see the taxobox on the Wheat page.
The most critical point is that different taxonomic schemes should not be mixed in one context. In a given article, book or web page, only one scheme should be used at a time. Otherwise, it will be unclear to others how the botanical name is being used.
Table of wheat species
|Wheat taxonomy - two schemes|
|Common name||Genome(s)||Genetic (GRIN Taxonomy for Plants )||Traditional (Dorofeev et al. 1979 )|
|Diploid (2x), Wild, Hulled|
|Wild einkorn||Am||Triticum monococcum L. subsp. aegilopoides (Link) Thell.||Triticum boeoticum Boiss.|
|Au||Triticum urartu Tumanian ex Gandilyan||Triticum urartu Tumanian ex Gandilyan|
|Diploid (2x), Domesticated, Hulled|
|Einkorn||Am||Triticum monococcum L. subsp. monococcum||Triticum monococcum L.|
|Tetraploid (4x), Wild, Hulled|
|Wild emmer||BAu||Triticum turgidum L. subsp. dicoccoides (Korn. ex Asch. & Graebn.) Thell.||Triticum dicoccoides (Körn. ex Asch. & Graebner) Schweinf.|
|Tetraploid (4x), Domesticated, Hulled|
|Emmer||BAu||Triticum turgidum L. subsp. dicoccum (Schrank ex Schubl.) Thell.||Triticum dicoccum Schrank ex Schübler|
|BAu||Triticum ispahanicum Heslot||Triticum ispahanicum Heslot|
|BAu||Triticum turgidum L. subsp. paleocolchicum A. Love & D. Love||Triticum karamyschevii Nevski|
|Tetraploid (4x), Domesticated, Free-threshing|
|Durum or macaroni wheat||BAu||Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum (Desf.) Husn.||Triticum durum Desf.|
|Rivet or cone wheat||BAu||Triticum turgidum L. subsp. turgidum||Triticum turgidum L.|
|Polish wheat||BAu||Triticum turgidum L. subsp. polonicum (L.) Thell.||Triticum polonicum L.|
|Khorasan wheat||BAu||Triticum turgidum L. subsp. turanicum (Jakubz.) A. Love & D. Love||Triticum turanicum Jakubz.|
|Persian wheat||BAu||Triticum turgidum L. subsp. carthlicum (Nevski) A. Love & D. Love||Triticum carthlicum Nevski in Kom.|
|Tetraploid (4x) - timopheevi group|
|GAu||Triticum timopheevii (Zhuk.) Zhuk. subsp. armeniacum (Jakubz.) Slageren||Triticum araraticum Jakubz.|
|GAu||Triticum timopheevii (Zhuk.) Zhuk. subsp. timopheevii||Triticum timopheevii (Zhuk.) Zhuk.|
|Hexaploid (6x), Domesticated, Hulled|
|Spelt wheat||BAuD||Triticum aestivum L. subsp. spelta (L.) Thell.||Triticum spelta L.|
|BAuD||Triticum aestivum L. subsp. macha (Dekapr. & A. M. Menabde) Mackey||Triticum macha Dekapr. & Menabde|
|BAuD||Triticum vavilovii Jakubz.||Triticum vavilovii (Tumanian) Jakubz.|
|Hexaploid (6x), Domesticated, Free-threshing|
|Common or bread wheat||BAuD||Triticum aestivum L. subsp. aestivum||Triticum aestivum L.|
|Club wheat||BAuD||Triticum aestivum L. subsp. compactum (Host) Mackey||Triticum compactum Host|
|Indian dwarf or shot wheat||BAuD||Triticum aestivum L. subsp. sphaerococcum (Percival) Mackey||Triticum sphaerococcum Percival|
Note: Blank common name indicates that no common name is in use in the English language.
Explanatory notes on selected names
- Triticum boeoticum Boiss. is sometimes divided into two subspecies:
- T. boeoticum Boiss. subsp. thaoudar (Reut. ex Hausskn.) E. Schiem. - with two grains in each spikelet, distributed to east of fertile crescent.
- T. boeoticum Boiss. subsp. boeoticum - one grain in each spikelet, in Balkans.
- Triticum dicoccum Schrank ex Schübler is also known as Triticum dicoccon Schrank.
- Triticum aethiopicum Jakubz. is a variant form of T. durum found in Ethiopia. It is not usually regarded as a separate species.
- Triticum karamyschevii Nevsky was previously known as Triticum paleocolchicum A. M. Menabde.
Artificial species and mutants
Russian botanists have given botanical names to hybrids developed during genetical experiments. As these only occur in the laboratory environment, it is questionable whether botanical names (rather than lab. numbers) are justified. Botanical names have also been given to rare mutant forms. Examples include:
- Triticum ×borisovii Zhebrak - (T. aestivum × T. timopheevi)
- Triticum ×fungicidum Zhuk. - Hexaploid, artificial cross (T. carthlicum × T. timopheevi)
- Triticum jakubzineri Udaczin & Schachm.
- Triticum militinae Zhuk. & Migush. - mutant form of T. timopheevi.
- Triticum petropavlovskyi Udaczin & Migush.
- Triticum sinskajae A.A.Filatenko & U.K.Kurkiev - mutant, free-threshing form of T. monococcum.
- Triticum ×timococcum Kostov
- Triticum timonovum Heslot - Hexaploid, artificial cross.
- Triticum zhukovskyi Menabde & Ericzjan (T. timopheevi × T. monococcum)