Talk:Back-chaining

WP

This started life on Wikipedia; however, checking the WP box doesn't work, at least not for me - Ro Thorpe 16:08, 27 December 2007 (CST)

You

Didn't you (and I also) take out some second-person stuff in the Bowling article? It's certainly easier to use in an article like this, but I wonder if it should be? It's really not v. encyclopediac.... Hayford Peirce 16:16, 27 December 2007 (CST)

Interesting. I suppose on 29 Sept over at WP things just didn't feel so formal (Mesdames et Messieurs). I'll see what I can do... Ro Thorpe 17:18, 27 December 2007 (CST)

Done. - So you put the WP thingy in - but it's still invisible here - Ro Thorpe 17:31, 27 December 2007 (CST)

Now I notice in the history John Stephenson had already recreated the article with WP in, thanks, John. I suppose it has to be done when creating... Ro Thorpe 17:42, 27 December 2007 (CST)

See how easy it was for a man of skills to de-You things, hehe? As for the WP notice, I've recently discovered that for *some* things to take effect, an actual edit has to be done to the article itself before it takes effect. In this case, I stuck an "x" in the article, saved it, reopened the article, removed the "x" and saved it again. But by now the WP notice was there. At least on *my* screen. Hayford Peirce 18:41, 27 December 2007 (CST)

It's arrived at last, yes. Even without my editing. Grazie mille - Ro Thorpe 18:48, 27 December 2007 (CST)