Decision engineering

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is basically copied from an external source and has not been approved.
Main Article
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
This editable Main Article is under development and not meant to be cited; by editing it you can help to improve it towards a future approved, citable version. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.
The content on this page originated on Wikipedia and is yet to be significantly improved. Contributors are invited to replace and add material to make this an original article.

Decision engineering (also referred to as decisional analysis) consists of designing, analysing and optimizing an organization to provide a more structured approach to decision making.

Taking into account operations research (new process, optimization of choices and experience feedback), technological research (creation of new methods) and operational evolution, decision engineering endeavours to create a coherent framework of:

  • Components of an organization structuring factors: Actors in their activities, divisions of the roles, value systems, information systems
  • Dynamic components: Actors' behaviors (wanted, possible, or dysfunctional)
  • Methods of evolution: Changes (spontaneous, stimulated, or controlled)

Context of application

The acceleration of the competition, the increase in the technical possibilities, the modification of the economic context and the eruption in the organizations of intelligent machines acting at the sides of men, is increasing a lot the complexity of the organizations. The architecture of the data-processing solutions then tends to be decentralized for better adapting to the life of the company.

Decision engineering provides a systematic, pragmatic and formalized method of decision making. One such method was originated by a Polish engineer, Janusz Bucki and is named B-ADSc (Bucki - Analyse Décisionelle des Systèmes complexes).[1]

The applications carried out to date with the assistance of this method, for the account of companies, relate to the engineering of the organizations, the computerization and the automation of the industrial and administrative processes.

The delegation of the decisions, according to the B-ADSc method, is the structuring factor of the organizations. The delegations lead to setting up new activities controlled by men or machines, each one of them constituting an autonomous center of decisions. To be effective, such delegations must be accompanied by corresponding controls. The “delegating” role of the activity moves to become dependent on more general decisions. Following a delegation, the number of decisions to be taken in an organization increases overall, just like the effort required for their development.

The delegation of the decisions can be related on the creation of new activities and the extension of the information system.

Taking into account the cost which results from it, all new delegation requires for validation a value engineering.

This analysis, led to evaluate the potential profits, follows three directions:

Improvement of operation 
elaborate more relevant decisions on the level of the system of delegation (suppression of nona quality),
Increase in the productivity 
by a reduction in the time of decision-making compared to the rhythm of the process (more treated volumes),
Increased availability of the actors operating in the roadbases 
thanks to the substitution of the decisions usually delegated by more total and less frequent decisions (releasing a potential which can be employed again in addition).

By difference of the traditional approaches, B-ADSc describes as complex any organization in which various autonomous actors are likely to contribute to the satisfaction of a common purpose.

By this way, the reactivity, flexibility, efficiency, the reliability and more generally the control of the systems and organizations are obtained easily with tools guaranteeing the treatment of :

  1. The man and his behavior;
  2. The computer and its logic;
  3. The organization and its Information system directed piloting of the operations.

In reference to Cybernetics, B-ADSc regards as autonomous any entity defined by the following criteria:

  • Integrity, not deterioration by the entourage;
  • Internal structure well defined;
  • Aptitude for the car determination or the car regulation towards internal or external stresses;
  • Capacity to articulate itself with the entourage;
  • “Metabolic” independence, detention of its own processor or proper piloting (capacity to act by oneself).

An organization, i.e., any system in which several autonomous actors (men or machines) are likely to contribute to the satisfaction of a common purpose, is characterized by:

  • The participation of the actors, whom it acts men or machines, likely to pursue their own goals while remaining in convergence of goals with the common purpose,
  • The autonomy of the actors, taking into account the distribution of the roles and their know-how, in the decision-making relating to the stock management which is accessible for them,
  • The pooling of the means and the capacities whose efficiency depends on the existence on procedures explicit and implicit rules of assignment and division in agreement with the continued purpose.
  • Evolutionarily being able to pass by:
    • The redefinition of the common purpose,
    • Repositioning of the individual objectives,
    • Development or the acquisition of new know-how,
    • The creation or acquisition of new means,
    • Redeployment of the actors,
  • The opening:
    • Capacity to integrate other organizations or other actors,
    • Capacity to be integrated in other organizations.

In addition, the perception of a chaotic evolution could be related to the coexistence, in a universe, of complex organizations from which the finalities are different, even concurrent. Chaos then reflects the interference, on the shared means, of the actions resulting from the various organizations in the absence of a context more general, therefore of a federator purpose. This situation of chaos is distinguished from that relating to the possible dysfunctions of an organization, themselves which had, for example, with a failing communication between the actors or with inadequate know-how.

Due to a new absorbing algebra of activities which constitutes the formal base of it, the B-ADSc method applied to the information processing systems leads in a natural way to the design and the programming (decisional programming) of the Massively parallel systems. Indeed, the vulgarizing of this technology could not be done without an easy and transmissible technique of programming of the massively parallel computers.

The generalization suggested of the logic of the 1st and 2nd order with the logic of the 3rd order opens new prospects in the field for the artificial intelligence, in particular with regard to the car training or the capacity of the computers to create new conjectures. That makes it possible for example to equip a robot with the aptitude in a new situation to build in an autonomous way a relevant behavior (capacity to face a case not envisaged in advance).


  1. Insitut de Génie Décisionnel (Institute of Decisional Engineering) Decision engineering in a strained industrial and business environment, Janusz Bucki and Sylvain Roth